• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与健康公民参与相关的因素:2018 年健康态度全国调查的结果,以了解朝着健康文化方向取得的进展。

Factors related to health civic engagement: results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes to understand progress towards a Culture of Health.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08507-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-08507-w
PMID:32380964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7203885/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Civic engagement, including voting, volunteering, and participating in civic organizations, is associated with better psychological, physical and behavioral health and well-being. In addition, civic engagement is increasingly viewed (e.g., in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Culture of Health action framework) as a potentially important driver for raising awareness of and addressing unhealthy conditions in communities. As such, it is important to understand the factors that may promote civic engagement, with a particular focus on the less-understood, health civic engagement, or civic engagement in health-related and health-specific activities. Using data from a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States (U.S.), we examined whether the extent to which individuals feel they belong in their community (i.e., perceived sense of community) and the value they placed on investing in community health were associated with individuals' health civic engagement.

METHODS

Using data collected on 7187 nationally representative respondents from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes, we examined associations between sense of community, valued investment in community health, and perceived barriers to taking action to invest in community health, with health civic engagement. We constructed continuous scales for each of these constructs and employed multiple linear regressions adjusting for multiple covariates including U.S. region and city size of residence, educational attainment, family income, race/ethnicity, household size, employment status, and years living in the community.

RESULTS

Participants who endorsed (i.e., responded with mostly or completely) all 16 sense of community scale items endorsed an average of 22.8% (95%CI: 19.8-25.7%) more of the health civic engagement scale items compared with respondents who did not endorse any of the sense of community items. Those who endorsed (responded that it was an important or top priority) all items capturing valued investment in community health endorsed 14.0% (95%CI: 11.2-16.8%) more of the health civic engagement items than those who did not endorse any valued investment in community health items.

CONCLUSIONS

Health civic engagement, including voting and volunteering to ultimately guide government decisions about health issues, may help improve conditions that influence health and well-being for all. Focusing on individuals' sense of community and highlighting investments in community health may concurrently be associated with increased health civic engagement and improved community and population health.

摘要

背景

公民参与,包括投票、志愿服务和参与公民组织,与更好的心理、身体和行为健康和福祉有关。此外,公民参与越来越被视为(例如,在罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会的健康文化行动框架中)是提高社区对不健康状况的认识和解决这些状况的一个潜在重要驱动因素。因此,了解可能促进公民参与的因素非常重要,特别是要关注不太被理解的健康公民参与,或与健康相关和特定于健康的活动中的公民参与。本研究使用来自美国全国代表性成年人样本的数据,考察了个人对自己所在社区的归属感(即感知社区感)以及他们对投资社区健康的重视程度与个人健康公民参与之间的关系。

方法

使用 2018 年全国健康态度调查收集的 7187 名全国代表性受访者的数据,本研究考察了社区感、对社区健康投资的重视程度以及对投资社区健康的行动障碍感知与健康公民参与之间的关系。我们为这些结构中的每一个都构建了连续的量表,并采用多元线性回归,调整了美国地区和居住城市规模、教育程度、家庭收入、种族/民族、家庭规模、就业状况和在社区居住年限等多个协变量。

结果

与不认同任何社区感项目的受访者相比,认同社区感量表中所有 16 个项目的参与者平均认同 22.8%(95%置信区间:19.8-25.7%)更多的健康公民参与项目。与不认同任何社区健康投资项目的受访者相比,认同所有捕捉到社区健康投资的重要性或优先性的项目的参与者,认同 14.0%(95%置信区间:11.2-16.8%)更多的健康公民参与项目。

结论

健康公民参与,包括投票和自愿参与,最终指导政府关于健康问题的决策,可能有助于改善影响所有人健康和福祉的条件。关注个人的社区意识,强调对社区健康的投资,可能会同时与增加健康公民参与以及改善社区和人口健康相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1675/7203885/abe658614f29/12889_2020_8507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1675/7203885/abe658614f29/12889_2020_8507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1675/7203885/abe658614f29/12889_2020_8507_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors related to health civic engagement: results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes to understand progress towards a Culture of Health.与健康公民参与相关的因素:2018 年健康态度全国调查的结果,以了解朝着健康文化方向取得的进展。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08507-w.
2
Genes, psychological traits and civic engagement.基因、心理特质与公民参与。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150015. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0015.
3
Civic engagement patterns and transitions over 8 years: the AmeriCorps national study.公民参与模式及其 8 年来的转变:美国志工全国研究。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1728-43. doi: 10.1037/a0025360. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
4
The Kids are All Right? Income Inequality and Civic Engagement among Our Nation's Youth.孩子们还好吗?美国青年中的收入不平等与公民参与度
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Nov;45(11):2218-2232. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0557-4. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
5
Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood.公民参与与成年过渡
Future Child. 2010 Spring;20(1):159-79. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0043.
6
Attachment to community and civic and political engagement: a case study of students.社区和公民及政治参与的依附:以学生为例。
Can Rev Sociol. 2014 Nov;51(4):375-88. doi: 10.1111/cars.12052.
7
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
8
Impacts of Adolescent and Young Adult Civic Engagement on Health and Socioeconomic Status in Adulthood.青少年和青年公民参与对成年后健康和社会经济地位的影响。
Child Dev. 2019 Jul;90(4):1138-1154. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12998. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
Civic Engagement Among California High School Teens.加利福尼亚州高中生的公民参与情况。
Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res. 2018 Dec;2018(11):1-10.
10
Offline and online civic engagement among adolescents and young adults from three ethnic groups.青少年和青年三个民族群体的线下和线上公民参与。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Jan;42(1):123-35. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9805-4. Epub 2012 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Community Training Institute for Health Disparities: Outcomes of a Formal Opportunity for Community Capacity Building to Increase Health Equity in Southern Puerto Rico.社区健康差异培训学院:波多黎各南部社区能力建设正式机会以提高健康公平性的成果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 9;22(1):80. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010080.
2
Centering historically minoritized populations to design effective messages about an evidence-based policy to advance social equity.以历史上被边缘化的人群为中心,设计关于一项基于证据的政策的有效信息,以促进社会公平。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jan 3;4(1):pgae588. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae588. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Social capital and self-rated health: A cross-sectional study of the general social survey data comparing rural and urban adults in Ontario.社会资本与自评健康:安大略省农村和城市成年人的一般社会调查数据的横断面研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Mar;27(2):424-436. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12662. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
2
Trust, sense of community, and civic engagement: Lessons from Australia.信任、社区意识和公民参与:来自澳大利亚的经验教训。
J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;47(2):254-271. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22119. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
3
How voter turnout varies between different chronic conditions? A population-based register study.
Bottom-up actions: Examining perceived influence of pandemic news, information relevance, perceived media credibility, and pro-community participation.
自下而上的行动:审视疫情新闻的感知影响、信息相关性、感知媒体可信度和亲社区参与度。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 16;10:20552076241281215. doi: 10.1177/20552076241281215. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Effect of social capital, social support and social network formation on the quality of life of American adults during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间美国成年人的社会资本、社会支持和社交网络形成对生活质量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):2647. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52820-y.
5
The Role of Primary Care in Advancing Civic Engagement and Health Equity: A Conceptual Framework.初级医疗保健在促进公民参与和健康公平方面的作用:概念框架。
Milbank Q. 2023 Sep;101(3):731-767. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12661. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Naming Civic Health in Environmental Justice Discourse: The Jackson Water Crisis.在环境正义话语中命名公民健康:杰克逊水危机
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Oct;14. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100378. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
7
The lived experiences of a COVID-19 immunization programme: vaccine hesitancy and vaccine refusal.COVID-19 疫苗接种计划的实际体验:疫苗犹豫和疫苗拒绝。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12632-z.
8
Assessing equity in health, wealth, and civic engagement: a nationally representative survey, United States, 2020.评估健康、财富和公民参与方面的公平性:2020 年美国全国代表性调查。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 28;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01609-w.
9
Explaining civic engagement: The role of neighborhood ties, place attachment, and civic responsibility.解释公民参与:邻里关系、地方依恋和公民责任的作用。
J Community Psychol. 2022 Apr;50(3):1736-1755. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22751. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
10
Peer-Led, Remote Intervention to Improve Mental Health Outcomes Using a Holistic, Spirituality-Based Approach: Results from a Pilot Study.同伴引导、远程干预,采用整体、基于灵性的方法改善心理健康结果:一项试点研究的结果。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Jul;58(5):862-874. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00893-8. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
不同慢性病患者的选民投票率如何变化?一项基于人群登记的研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 May;71(5):475-479. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208314. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
4
Drivers Of Health As A Shared Value: Mindset, Expectations, Sense Of Community, And Civic Engagement.作为共享价值的健康驱动因素:思维模式、期望、社区意识和公民参与。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):1959-1963. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0603.
5
Mutuality, mobilization, and messaging for health promotion: Toward collective cultural change.促进健康的相互性、动员与信息传播:迈向集体文化变革。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.040. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
6
How does a culture of health change? Lessons from the war on cigarettes.健康文化是如何改变的?从烟草战争中汲取的教训。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
7
Depression and Political Participation.抑郁与政治参与。
Soc Sci Q. 2015 Nov;96(5):1226-1243. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12173. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
8
The Bodies Politic: Chronic Health Conditions and Voter Turnout in the 2008 Election.政治实体:2008年选举中的慢性健康状况与选民投票率
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Dec;40(6):1115-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3424450. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
9
In sickness and in health.无论疾病还是健康。
Politics Life Sci. 2015 Spring;34(1):28-43. doi: 10.1017/pls.2015.3.
10
Smoking and (Not) Voting: The Negative Relationship Between a Health-Risk Behavior and Political Participation in Colorado.吸烟与(不)投票:科罗拉多州一种健康风险行为与政治参与之间的负相关关系
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Mar;18(3):371-6. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv098. Epub 2015 May 8.