Nishikawa Tetsuo, Omura Masao, Kawaguchi Migaku, Takatsu Akiko, Satoh Fumitoshi, Ito Sadayoshi, Kurihara Isao, Itoh Hiroshi, Yanase Toshihiko, Shibata Hirotaka, Oki Yutaka, Naruse Mitsuhide, Sakurai Keiko, Sasamoto Hidehiko, Kuwa Katsuhiko
Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Endocr J. 2016 Dec 30;63(12):1065-1080. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ16-0304. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
We attempted to study the standardization of aldosterone measurement in blood. The serum certified reference material (serum CRM) was established by spiking healthy human serum with pure aldosterone. ID-LC/MS/MS as a reference measurement procedure was performed by using the serum CRM. LC-MS/MS as a comparison method (CM) was routinely used for clinical samples, and the values with and without calibration by the serum CRM were compared. The serum CRM demonstrated similar reactivity with peripheral blood plasma as clinical samples in routine methods (RM) of RIA, ELISA, and CLEIA. In comparison between RM and CM, the results in regression analysis indicated that the range of the correlation coefficient (r) was 0.913 - 0.991, the range of y intercept was 0.9 - 67.3 pg/mL and the range of slope was 0.869 - 1.174. The values by RM in 100 - 150 pg/mL for the diagnostic level, had a significant calibration effect, and the relative difference between calibrated value in RM and result by CM was within ±20%. Furthermore, the calibrated value using the serum CRM was 10,187 pg/mL, which corresponds to measured value of 14,000 pg/mL using RIA for the adrenal venous sampling. Measured values between plasma and serum as a sample for the aldosterone measurement from clinical samples showed no significant differences. In conclusion, we succeeded to prepare the certified reference material of aldosterone for RM. Then, we can accurately calculate corrected values by using our equation for four RMs of determination of aldosterone.
我们试图研究血液中醛固酮测量的标准化。通过向健康人血清中添加纯醛固酮来制备血清认证参考物质(血清CRM)。使用血清CRM通过同位素稀释液相色谱-串联质谱法(ID-LC/MS/MS)作为参考测量程序。液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)作为比较方法(CM)常规用于临床样本,并比较了使用血清CRM校准前后的值。在放射免疫分析(RIA)、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和化学发光酶免疫分析(CLEIA)的常规方法(RM)中,血清CRM与临床样本外周血浆表现出相似的反应性。在RM和CM的比较中,回归分析结果表明,相关系数(r)范围为0.913 - 0.991,y轴截距范围为0.9 - 67.3 pg/mL,斜率范围为0.869 - 1.174。RM在诊断水平100 - 150 pg/mL时的值具有显著的校准效果,RM校准值与CM结果之间的相对差异在±20%以内。此外,使用血清CRM的校准值为10,187 pg/mL,这与肾上腺静脉采血使用RIA测量的14,000 pg/mL测量值相对应。作为醛固酮测量样本的临床样本中血浆和血清之间的测量值无显著差异。总之,我们成功制备了用于RM的醛固酮认证参考物质。然后,我们可以使用我们的方程式准确计算醛固酮测定的四种RM的校正值。