Suppr超能文献

Endoscopic needle biopsy: a comparative study of forceps biopsy, two different types of needles, and salvage cytology in gastrointestinal cancer.

作者信息

Graham D Y, Tabibian N, Michaletz P A, Kinner B M, Schwartz J T, Heiser M C, Dixon W B, Smith J L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas 77030.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 May-Jun;35(3):207-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72759-0.

Abstract

One of the goals of gastrointestinal endoscopy is to diagnose whether a lesion is malignant. The desire to improve the sensitivity of biopsy-sampling techniques prompted us to compare prospectively the reliability and accuracy of obtaining tissue by forceps biopsy, needle biopsy (21 gauge 13-mm long metal needles versus 18 gauge 20-mm long plastic needles), and salvage cytology in patients with endoscopically suspected malignancy. Samples were obtained in the order of needle biopsy (the order of metal and plastic needle biopsy was randomized), forceps biopsy, followed by salvage cytology. Needle biopsies were obtained by puncturing the lesion under direct vision while aspirating with a syringe. Twenty-three patients with gastrointestinal malignancy were studied (7 esophageal, 4 gastric, and 12 colonic). Forceps biopsies were positive in 18 of 23 (78%), missing 1 gastric and 4 colon malignancies. Metal needle biopsy was positive in 16 of 19 (84%), plastic needle biopsy in 17 of 22 (77%), and salvage cytology in 20 of 22 (91%). Accuracy was increased by a combination of techniques. Endoscopic needle biopsy is a simple and rapid method to evaluate lesions seen at endoscopy and is especially useful in evaluation of submucosal lesions.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验