Schulte P A, Roth G, Hodson L L, Murashov V, Hoover M D, Zumwalde R, Kuempel E D, Geraci C L, Stefaniak A B, Castranova V, Howard J
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV, USA.
School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
J Nanopart Res. 2016 Jun;18:159. doi: 10.1007/s11051-016-3459-1. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Engineered nanomaterials significantly entered commerce at the beginning of the 21st century. Concerns about serious potential health effects of nanomaterials were widespread. Now, approximately 15 years later, it is worthwhile to take stock of research and efforts to protect nanomaterial workers from potential risks of adverse health effects. This article provides and examines timelines for major functional areas (toxicology, metrology, exposure assessment, engineering controls and personal protective equipment, risk assessment, risk management, medical surveillance, and epidemiology) to identify significant contributions to worker safety and health. The occupational safety and health field has responded effectively to identify gaps in knowledge and practice, but further research is warranted and is described. There is now a greater, if imperfect, understanding of the mechanisms underlying nanoparticle toxicology, hazards to workers, and appropriate controls for nanomaterials, but unified analytical standards and exposure characterization methods are still lacking. The development of control-banding and similar strategies has compensated for incomplete data on exposure and risk, but it is unknown how widely such approaches are being adopted. Although the importance of epidemiologic studies and medical surveillance is recognized, implementation has been slowed by logistical issues. Responsible development of nanotechnology requires protection of workers at all stages of the technological life cycle. In each of the functional areas assessed, progress has been made, but more is required.
工程纳米材料在21世纪初大量进入商业领域。当时,人们普遍担忧纳米材料可能对健康产生严重影响。如今,大约15年过去了,有必要对保护纳米材料从业者免受潜在健康危害的研究和努力进行评估。本文提供并审视了主要功能领域(毒理学、计量学、暴露评估、工程控制和个人防护装备、风险评估、风险管理、医学监测和流行病学)的时间线,以确定对劳动者安全与健康的重大贡献。职业安全与健康领域已有效做出回应,以识别知识和实践中的差距,但仍需进一步研究,并在文中有所描述。目前,对于纳米颗粒毒理学的潜在机制、对劳动者的危害以及纳米材料的适当控制方法,人们有了更深入(尽管仍不完善)的理解,但统一的分析标准和暴露特征描述方法仍然缺乏。控制分级及类似策略的发展弥补了暴露和风险数据的不足,但尚不清楚这些方法的采用范围有多广。尽管流行病学研究和医学监测的重要性已得到认可,但实施工作因后勤问题而放缓。负责任地发展纳米技术需要在技术生命周期的各个阶段保护劳动者。在所评估的每个功能领域都取得了进展,但仍有更多工作要做。