Orozco Villaseñor Diego A, Wimmer Markus A
Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S. Morgan Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA; Departamento de Bioingeniería, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S. Morgan Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2071945. doi: 10.1155/2016/2071945. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
The aim of this study was to determine how representative wear scars of simulator-tested polyethylene (PE) inserts compare with retrieved PE inserts from total knee replacement (TKR). By means of a nonparametric self-organizing feature map (SOFM), wear scar images of 21 postmortem- and 54 revision-retrieved components were compared with six simulator-tested components that were tested either in displacement or in load control according to ISO protocols. The SOFM network was then trained with the wear scar images of postmortem-retrieved components since those are considered well-functioning at the time of retrieval. Based on this training process, eleven clusters were established, suggesting considerable variability among wear scars despite an uncomplicated loading history inside their hosts. The remaining components (revision-retrieved and simulator-tested) were then assigned to these established clusters. Six out of five simulator components were clustered together, suggesting that the network was able to identify similarities in loading history. However, the simulator-tested components ended up in a cluster at the fringe of the map containing only 10.8% of retrieved components. This may suggest that current ISO testing protocols were not fully representative of this TKR population, and protocols that better resemble patients' gait after TKR containing activities other than walking may be warranted.
本研究的目的是确定模拟器测试的聚乙烯(PE)植入物的磨损疤痕与全膝关节置换术(TKR)中取出的PE植入物相比具有多大的代表性。通过非参数自组织特征映射(SOFM),将21个尸体取出和54个翻修取出组件的磨损疤痕图像与6个根据ISO协议在位移或载荷控制下进行测试的模拟器测试组件进行比较。然后用尸体取出组件的磨损疤痕图像训练SOFM网络,因为这些组件在取出时被认为功能良好。基于这个训练过程,建立了11个聚类,这表明尽管宿主内部的加载历史并不复杂,但磨损疤痕之间存在相当大的变异性。然后将其余组件(翻修取出和模拟器测试)分配到这些已建立的聚类中。五个模拟器组件中有六个聚在一起,这表明该网络能够识别加载历史中的相似性。然而,模拟器测试的组件最终位于地图边缘的一个聚类中,该聚类仅包含10.8%的取出组件。这可能表明当前的ISO测试协议不能完全代表这个TKR人群,可能需要制定更类似于TKR后患者步态且包含步行以外活动的协议。