French Andrew S, Zadoks Ruth N, Skuce Philip J, Mitchell Gillian, Gordon-Gibbs Danielle K, Craine Alexandra, Shaw David, Gibb Stuart W, Taggart Mark A
Environmental Research Institute, North Highland College, University of the Highlands and Islands, Castle Street, Thurso, KW14 7JD, United Kingdom.
Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, EH26 0PZ, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 6;11(9):e0162420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162420. eCollection 2016.
Red deer (Cervus elaphus) are hosts of liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica); yet, prevalence is rarely quantified in wild populations. Testing fresh samples from remote regions by faecal examination (FE) can be logistically challenging; hence, we appraise frozen storage and the use of a coproantigen ELISA (cELISA) for F. hepatica surveillance. We also present cELISA surveillance data for red deer from the Highlands of Scotland. Diagnoses in faecal samples (207 frozen, 146 fresh) were compared using a cELISA and by FE. For each storage method (frozen or fresh), agreement between the two diagnostics was estimated at individual and population levels, where population prevalence was stratified into cohorts (e.g., by sampling location). To approximate sensitivity and specificity, 65 post-slaughter whole liver examinations were used as a reference. At the individual level, FE and cELISA diagnoses agreed moderately (κfrozen = 0.46; κfresh = 0.51), a likely reflection of their underlying principles. At the population level, FE and cELISA cohort prevalence correlated strongly (Pearson's R = 0.89, p < 0.0001), reflecting good agreement on relative differences between cohort prevalence. In frozen samples, prevalence by cELISA exceeded FE overall (42.8% vs. 25.8%) and in 9/12 cohorts, alluding to differences in sensitivity; though, in fresh samples, no significant difference was found. In 959 deer tested by cELISA across the Scottish Highlands, infection prevalence ranged from 9.6% to 53% by sampling location. We highlight two key advantages of cELISA over FE: i) the ability to store samples long term (frozen) without apparent loss in diagnostic power; and ii) reduced labour and the ability to process large batches. Further evaluation of cELISA sensitivity in red deer, where a range of fluke burdens can be obtained, is desirable. In the interim, the cELISA is a practicable diagnostic for F. hepatica surveillance in red deer, and its application here has revealed considerable geographic, temporal, sex and age related differences in F. hepatica prevalence in wild Scottish Highland red deer.
马鹿(Cervus elaphus)是肝吸虫(Fasciola hepatica)的宿主;然而,野生种群中的感染率很少被量化。通过粪便检查(FE)对偏远地区的新鲜样本进行检测在后勤保障方面可能具有挑战性;因此,我们评估了冷冻保存以及使用粪便抗原酶联免疫吸附测定(cELISA)进行肝吸虫监测的情况。我们还展示了来自苏格兰高地马鹿的cELISA监测数据。使用cELISA和粪便检查对粪便样本(207份冷冻样本,146份新鲜样本)进行诊断比较。对于每种保存方法(冷冻或新鲜),在个体和种群水平上估计两种诊断方法之间的一致性,其中种群感染率按队列分层(例如,按采样地点)。为了近似估计敏感性和特异性,将65次屠宰后的全肝检查用作参考。在个体水平上,粪便检查和cELISA诊断结果有中等程度的一致性(κ冷冻 = 0.46;κ新鲜 = 0.51),这可能反映了它们的基本原理。在种群水平上,粪便检查和cELISA队列感染率密切相关(皮尔逊相关系数R = 0.89,p < 0.0001),这反映了在队列感染率相对差异方面的良好一致性。在冷冻样本中,cELISA检测出的总体感染率超过了粪便检查(42.8%对25.8%),并且在12个队列中的9个队列中也是如此,这暗示了敏感性的差异;不过,在新鲜样本中未发现显著差异。在苏格兰高地通过cELISA检测的959只马鹿中,按采样地点划分,感染率在9.6%至53%之间。我们强调了cELISA相对于粪便检查的两个关键优势:i)能够长期(冷冻)保存样本而诊断能力无明显损失;ii)减少劳动力且能够处理大批量样本。在可以获得一系列吸虫负荷的马鹿中进一步评估cELISA的敏感性是很有必要的。在此期间,cELISA是马鹿肝吸虫监测的一种可行诊断方法,并且它在此处的应用揭示了野生苏格兰高地马鹿肝吸虫感染率在地理、时间、性别和年龄方面存在相当大的差异。