• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗机构关于围产期抑郁症检测与护理情况的报告:来自墨西哥公立产科单位的定量证据。

Provider report of the existence of detection and care of perinatal depression: quantitative evidence from public obstetric units in Mexico.

作者信息

Castro Filipa de, Place Jean Marie, Allen-Leigh Betania, Rivera-Rivera Leonor, Billings Deborah

出版信息

Salud Publica Mex. 2016 Aug;58(4):468-71. doi: 10.21149/spm.v58i4.8028.

DOI:10.21149/spm.v58i4.8028
PMID:27599080
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence on perinatal mental healthcare in Mexico.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Descriptive and bivariate analyses of data from a cross-sectional probabilistic survey of 211 public obstetric units.

RESULTS

Over half (64.0%) of units offer mental healthcare; fewer offer perinatal depression (PND) detection (37.1%) and care (40.3%). More units had protocols/guidelines for PND detection and for care, respectively, in Mexico City-Mexico state (76.7%; 78.1%) than in Southern (26.5%; 36.4%), Northern (27.3%; 28.1%) and Central Mexico (50.0%; 52.7%).

CONCLUSION

Protocols and provider training in PND, implementation of brief screening tools and psychosocial interventions delivered by non-clinical personnel are needed.

摘要

目的

提供有关墨西哥围产期精神卫生保健的证据。

材料与方法

对211个公共产科单位的横断面概率调查数据进行描述性和双变量分析。

结果

超过半数(64.0%)的单位提供精神卫生保健;提供围产期抑郁症(PND)检测(37.1%)和护理(40.3%)的单位较少。与南部(26.5%;36.4%)、北部(27.3%;28.1%)和墨西哥中部(50.0%;52.7%)相比,墨西哥城-墨西哥州有更多单位分别制定了PND检测和护理的方案/指南(76.7%;78.1%)。

结论

需要制定PND方案并对医疗服务提供者进行培训,实施简短筛查工具以及由非临床人员提供社会心理干预。

相似文献

1
Provider report of the existence of detection and care of perinatal depression: quantitative evidence from public obstetric units in Mexico.医疗机构关于围产期抑郁症检测与护理情况的报告:来自墨西哥公立产科单位的定量证据。
Salud Publica Mex. 2016 Aug;58(4):468-71. doi: 10.21149/spm.v58i4.8028.
2
Early intervention for perinatal depression.围产期抑郁症的早期干预。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1446-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.073.
3
Detection and care practices for postpartum depressive symptoms in public-sector obstetric units in Mexico: Qualitative results from a resource-constrained setting.墨西哥公共部门产科单位产后抑郁症状的检测与护理实践:资源受限环境下的定性研究结果
Birth. 2017 Dec;44(4):390-396. doi: 10.1111/birt.12304. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Detection, treatment, and referral of perinatal depression and anxiety by obstetrical providers.产科医护人员对围产期抑郁和焦虑的检测、治疗和转诊。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Mar;19(3):477-90. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1352.
5
Tailoring screening protocols for perinatal depression: prevalence of high risk across obstetric services in Western Australia.为围产期抑郁症量身定制筛查方案:西澳大利亚州各产科服务机构中高风险的患病率
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009 Apr;12(2):105-12. doi: 10.1007/s00737-009-0048-7. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of the three Whooley and Arroll questions for detecting perinatal depression in Mexican women.Whooley 和 Arroll 三个问题对检测墨西哥妇女围产期抑郁的敏感性和特异性。
Salud Publica Mex. 2019 Ene-Feb;61(1):27-34. doi: 10.21149/9083.
7
Differences in Screening and Treatment for Antepartum Versus Postpartum Patients: Are Providers Implementing the Guidelines of Care for Perinatal Depression?产前与产后患者的筛查和治疗差异:提供者是否在实施围产期抑郁症护理指南?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Sep;27(9):1104-1113. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6765. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
Improving Perinatal Mental Health Care for Women Veterans: Description of a Quality Improvement Program.改善退伍女兵围产期心理健康护理:一项质量改进计划的描述
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Aug;21(8):1598-1605. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2285-0.
9
More than the blues: perinatal depression.不止是忧郁:围产期抑郁症
Nebr Nurse. 2007 Sep-Nov;40(3):8-13; quiz 14-5, 23.
10
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion no. 630. Screening for perinatal depression.美国妇产科医师学会意见书第630号:围产期抑郁症筛查
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1268-1271. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000465192.34779.dc.