Lee Chang Kyu, Yoon Do Heum, Kim Keung Nyun, Yi Seong, Shin Dong Ah, Kim Byeongwoo, Lee Nam, Ha Yoon
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;96:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.110. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
To compare the clinical characteristics of cervical spine trauma in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) with those of a control group.
A total of 124 patients with cervical spine trauma from January 2004 to December 2013 were reviewed. Fourteen patients were diagnosed with AS and 25 patients were diagnosed with OPLL; 85 patients were controls. C-spine plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained for evaluation of cervical spine trauma. The American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale and Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification were used to evaluate the neurologic status of patients and the fracture mechanism.
Patients with AS or OPLL had more spinal injuries associated with minor trauma than did the control group. All patients with AS had spinal fracture injuries after cervical spine trauma, but patients with OPLL mostly had spinal cord injuries without bony fractures. After cervical spine trauma, delayed diagnosis occurred in 3 patients with AS (21.4%) and 4 patients with OPLL (15.6%). Improvement from neurologic deficit after treatment showed better outcomes in patients with AS and OPLL than in controls (P = 0.106).
Patients with AS or OPLL who had cervical spine trauma showed different characteristics and outcomes than control patients. Proper surgical treatment led to better outcomes in both patients with AS and patients with OPLL than in control patients. Moreover, it is important to thoroughly examine patients with AS or OPLL after cervical trauma so as not to delay diagnosis.
比较强直性脊柱炎(AS)和后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)患者颈椎创伤的临床特征与对照组的差异。
回顾性分析2004年1月至2013年12月期间124例颈椎创伤患者。其中14例诊断为AS,25例诊断为OPLL;85例为对照组。采用颈椎X线平片、计算机断层扫描及磁共振成像评估颈椎创伤情况。使用美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级和下颈椎损伤分类评估患者的神经功能状态及骨折机制。
与对照组相比,AS或OPLL患者因轻微创伤导致的脊柱损伤更多。所有AS患者颈椎创伤后均发生脊柱骨折损伤,但OPLL患者大多为脊髓损伤而无骨折。颈椎创伤后,3例AS患者(21.4%)和4例OPLL患者(15.6%)出现延迟诊断。治疗后神经功能缺损改善情况显示,AS和OPLL患者优于对照组(P = 0.106)。
AS或OPLL颈椎创伤患者表现出与对照组不同的特征和预后。适当的手术治疗使AS和OPLL患者的预后均优于对照组。此外,颈椎创伤后对AS或OPLL患者进行全面检查以避免延迟诊断很重要。