• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
'It's surprising how differently they treat you': a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors.“他们对待你的方式差异之大令人惊讶”:对全科医生新培训项目中学员反思的定性分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 6;6(9):e011239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011239.
2
nhancing the quality and safety of care through training generalist doctors: a longitudinal, mixed-methods study of a UK broad-based training programme.通过培训全科医生提高医疗服务质量与安全:一项针对英国基础广泛培训项目的纵向混合方法研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 12;8(4):e021388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021388.
3
'A Unique opportunity to test things out': a qualitative study of broad-based training in Scotland.“一个测试事物的独特机会”:苏格兰基础广泛培训的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 18;13(5):e067733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067733.
4
Sustained benefits of a generalist training programme for UK doctors: a survey-based follow-up study.英国医生通才培训计划的持续效益:基于调查的随访研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 7;14(2):e079435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079435.
5
Perceived causes of differential attainment in UK postgraduate medical training: a national qualitative study.英国研究生医学培训中成绩差异的感知原因:一项全国性定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 25;6(11):e013429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013429.
6
Disciplinary boundaries and integrating care: using Q-methodology to understand trainee views on being a good doctor.学科界限与整合照护:运用 Q 方法理解医学生成为好医生的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 15;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1493-2.
7
'You can't be a person and a doctor': the work-life balance of doctors in training-a qualitative study.“你不能既是一个普通人又是一名医生”:规培医生的工作与生活平衡——一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 2;6(12):e013897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013897.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
A "neglected part of the curriculum" or "of limited use"? Views on genetics training by nongenetics medical trainees and implications for delivery.“课程中被忽视的部分”还是“用处有限”?非遗传学医学实习生对遗传学培训的看法及其对培训实施的影响
Genet Med. 2006 Feb;8(2):109-15. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000200159.19920.b5.
10
Building a safer foundation: the Lessons Learnt patient safety training programme.建立更安全的基础:经验教训患者安全培训计划。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan;23(1):78-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001740. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustained benefits of a generalist training programme for UK doctors: a survey-based follow-up study.英国医生通才培训计划的持续效益:基于调查的随访研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 7;14(2):e079435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079435.
2
Newly qualified doctors' perceived effects of assistantship alignment with first post: a longitudinal questionnaire study.新获得资格的医生对助理职位的看法与第一份工作的一致性:一项纵向问卷调查研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e023992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023992.
3
Disciplinary boundaries and integrating care: using Q-methodology to understand trainee views on being a good doctor.学科界限与整合照护:运用 Q 方法理解医学生成为好医生的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 15;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1493-2.
4
Where did the acute medical trainees go?急性医学实习生们都去哪儿了?
Clin Med (Lond). 2017 Feb;17(1):96. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-1-96.

本文引用的文献

1
A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: a guide for medical educators.医学生和住院医师专业身份形成与社会化的示意图:医学教育工作者指南
Acad Med. 2015 Jun;90(6):718-25. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000700.
2
Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review.协作网络中的桥梁、中介和边界跨越者:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 30;13:158. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158.
3
Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study.共病的流行病学及其对医疗保健、研究和医学教育的影响:一项横断面研究。
Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2. Epub 2012 May 10.
4
Renaissance of hospital generalists.医院通科医生的复兴。
BMJ. 2012 Feb 13;344:e652. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e652.
5
Between-group behaviour in health care: gaps, edges, boundaries, disconnections, weak ties, spaces and holes. A systematic review.群组间的医疗行为:差距、边缘、边界、脱节、弱联系、空间和漏洞。系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 7;10:330. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-330.
6
Identity, identification and medical education: why should we care?身份认同、识别与医学教育:我们为何要关注?
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):40-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03440.x.
7
Reconfiguring or reproducing intra-professional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledge and the 'modernization' of the medical workforce.重新配置或重塑专业内部界限?专家专长、通才知识与医疗劳动力“现代化”
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Apr;68(7):1191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
8
Belongingness: a prerequisite for nursing students' clinical learning.归属感:护理专业学生临床学习的一个先决条件。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2008 Mar;8(2):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 May 31.
9
An empirical assessment of social structural and cultural change in clinical directorates.临床科室社会结构与文化变革的实证评估
Health Care Anal. 2006 Dec;14(4):185-93. doi: 10.1007/s10728-006-0025-5.
10
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.

“他们对待你的方式差异之大令人惊讶”:对全科医生新培训项目中学员反思的定性分析

'It's surprising how differently they treat you': a qualitative analysis of trainee reflections on a new programme for generalist doctors.

作者信息

Muddiman E, Bullock A D, MacDonald J, Allery L, Webb K L, Pugsley L

机构信息

Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation into Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, UK.

Cardiff University School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 6;6(9):e011239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011239.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011239
PMID:27601487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5020751/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

An increase in patients with long-term conditions and complex care needs presents new challenges to healthcare providers around the developed world. In response, more broad-based training programmes have developed to better prepare trainees for the changing landscape of healthcare delivery. This paper focuses on qualitative elements of a longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of the postgraduate, post-Foundation Broad-Based Training (BBT) programme in England. It aims to provide a qualitative analysis of trainees' evaluations of whether the programme meets its intentions to develop practitioners adept at managing complex cases, patient focused care, specialty integration and conviction in career choice. We also identify unintended consequences.

SETTING

9 focus groups of BBT trainees were held over a 12-month period. Discussions were audio-recorded and subjected to directed content analysis. Data were collected from trainees across all 7 participating regions: East Midlands; West Midlands; Severn; Northern; North Western; Yorkshire and Humber; Kent, Surry and Sussex.

PARTICIPANTS

Focus group participants (61 in total) from the first and second cohorts of BBT.

RESULTS

Evidence from trainees indicated that the programme was meeting its aims: trainees valued the extra time to decide on their onward career specialty, having a wider experience and developing a more integrated perspective. They thought of themselves as different and perceived that others they worked alongside also saw them as different. Being different meant benefitting from novel training experiences and opportunities for self-development. However, unintended consequences were feelings of isolation, and uncertainty about professional identity.

CONCLUSIONS

By spanning boundaries between specialties, trainee generalists have the potential to improve experiences and outcomes for patients with complex health needs. However, the sense of isolation will inhibit this potential. We employ the concept of 'belongingness' to identify challenges related to the implementation of generalist training programmes within existing structures of healthcare provision.

摘要

目标

患有长期疾病且有复杂护理需求的患者数量增加,给发达国家的医疗服务提供者带来了新的挑战。作为回应,已制定了更广泛的培训计划,以使学员更好地为不断变化的医疗服务格局做好准备。本文重点关注对英格兰研究生基础后广泛培训(BBT)计划进行纵向、混合方法评估的定性要素。其目的是对学员对该计划是否实现其培养善于管理复杂病例、以患者为中心的护理、专科整合以及职业选择信念的从业者的意图的评估进行定性分析。我们还确定了意外后果。

背景

在12个月的时间里,对BBT学员进行了9次焦点小组讨论。讨论进行了录音,并进行了定向内容分析。数据收集自所有7个参与地区的学员:东米德兰兹;西米德兰兹;塞文;北部;西北部;约克郡和亨伯;肯特、萨里和苏塞克斯。

参与者

来自BBT第一批和第二批学员的焦点小组参与者(共61人)。

结果

学员的证据表明该计划正在实现其目标:学员重视有额外的时间来决定他们未来的职业专科,拥有更广泛的经验并形成更综合的观点。他们认为自己与众不同,并认为与他们一起工作的其他人也认为他们与众不同。与众不同意味着受益于新颖的培训经历和自我发展的机会。然而,意外后果是孤独感和职业身份的不确定性。

结论

通过跨越专科之间的界限,实习全科医生有潜力改善有复杂健康需求患者的就医体验和治疗结果。然而,孤独感将抑制这种潜力。我们运用“归属感”的概念来确定与在现有医疗服务提供结构内实施全科医生培训计划相关的挑战。