Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗治疗活动性非感染性葡萄膜炎患者的疗效。

Adalimumab in Patients with Active Noninfectious Uveitis.

机构信息

From Duke University, Durham, NC (G.J.J.); University of Bristol, Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London - both in the United Kingdom (A.D.D.); Université Paris Descartes, Hôpital Cochin, Paris (A.P.B.); Truhlsen Eye Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (Q.D.N.); Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore (J.E.T.); Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.K.); Laura Bassi Center of Expertise Ocuvac, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (T.B.-A.); Organización Médica de Investigación, Buenos Aires (P.F.); the Department of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus-Hospital Münster, Münster (A.H.), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen (A.H.), and AbbVie Deutschland, Ludwigshafen (A.C., M.K.) - all in Germany; University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio (D.S.); Metropolitan Eye Research and Surgery Institute, Palisades Park, NJ (D.S.C.); AbbVie, North Chicago, IL (N.V.K., A.P.S., S.T.); and Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and VA Portland Health Care System (E.B.S.) - both in Portland.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 8;375(10):932-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509852.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with noninfectious uveitis are at risk for long-term complications of uncontrolled inflammation, as well as for the adverse effects of long-term glucocorticoid therapy. We conducted a trial to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis.

METHODS

This multinational phase 3 trial involved adults who had active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis despite having received prednisone treatment for 2 or more weeks. Investigators and patients were unaware of the study-group assignments. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adalimumab (a loading dose of 80 mg followed by a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks) or matched placebo. All patients received a mandatory prednisone burst followed by tapering of prednisone over the course of 15 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the time to treatment failure occurring at or after week 6. Treatment failure was a multicomponent outcome that was based on assessment of new inflammatory lesions, best corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber cell grade, and vitreous haze grade. Nine ranked secondary efficacy end points were assessed, and adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

The median time to treatment failure was 24 weeks in the adalimumab group and 13 weeks in the placebo group. Among the 217 patients in the intention-to-treat population, those receiving adalimumab were less likely than those in the placebo group to have treatment failure (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.70; P<0.001). Outcomes with regard to three secondary end points (change in anterior chamber cell grade, change in vitreous haze grade, and change in best corrected visual acuity) were significantly better in the adalimumab group than in the placebo group. Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported more frequently among patients who received adalimumab (1052.4 vs. 971.7 adverse events and 28.8 vs. 13.6 serious adverse events per 100 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

In our trial, adalimumab was found to be associated with a lower risk of uveitic flare or visual impairment and with more adverse events and serious adverse events than was placebo. (Funded by AbbVie; VISUAL I ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01138657 .).

摘要

背景

患有非传染性葡萄膜炎的患者存在长期炎症控制不佳的并发症风险,以及长期糖皮质激素治疗的不良反应风险。我们开展了一项试验,以评估阿达木单抗作为糖皮质激素节约剂治疗非传染性葡萄膜炎的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项多中心 3 期试验纳入了患有活动性非传染性中间葡萄膜炎、后葡萄膜炎或全葡萄膜炎的成年人,这些患者在接受泼尼松治疗 2 周或更长时间后仍有炎症活动。研究者和患者均不知道分组情况。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受阿达木单抗(负荷剂量 80 mg,随后每 2 周 40 mg)或匹配安慰剂。所有患者均接受了强制性泼尼松冲击治疗,然后在 15 周内逐渐减少泼尼松的剂量。主要疗效终点是在第 6 周或之后发生治疗失败的时间。治疗失败是一个基于新的炎症病灶、最佳矫正视力、前房细胞分级和玻璃体内混浊分级评估的多因素结局。评估了 9 个次要的疗效终点,并报告了不良反应。

结果

在意向治疗人群的 217 例患者中,阿达木单抗组的中位治疗失败时间为 24 周,安慰剂组为 13 周。与安慰剂组相比,接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者发生治疗失败的可能性更低(风险比,0.50;95%置信区间,0.36 至 0.70;P<0.001)。阿达木单抗组在 3 个次要终点(前房细胞分级变化、玻璃体内混浊分级变化和最佳矫正视力变化)的结局明显优于安慰剂组。接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者报告的不良反应和严重不良反应更为频繁(每 100 人年发生 1052.4 次不良反应和 28.8 次严重不良反应,而安慰剂组为 971.7 次不良反应和 13.6 次严重不良反应)。

结论

在我们的试验中,与安慰剂相比,阿达木单抗与较低的葡萄膜炎发作或视力损害风险相关,且发生不良反应和严重不良反应的风险更高。(由 AbbVie 资助;VISUAL I 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT01138657)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验