Smith Dean, Yong Kwee
Department of Haematology, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
Department of Haematology, University College, London, UK.
Br J Haematol. 2016 Nov;175(3):367-380. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14304. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
In the last two decades outcomes in multiple myeloma (myeloma) have greatly improved, due to the introduction of newer, more effective therapies. This improvement is not uniform. Response to treatment and survival remains heterogeneous, with some patients living for 1-2 years whilst others are alive and progression-free at 10 years. This variation in outcome is due to patient characteristics plus features intrinsic to the myeloma tumour. Alongside the introduction of novel therapies there has been a greater understanding of disease biology and mechanisms of resistance. This has led to an increase in the number of prognostic markers that can be used in myeloma. This is important not only for more accurate counselling of patients in terms of disease outcome, but also in paving the way for risk-adapted therapy. Both newer and traditional prognostic markers need to be used in the context of planned therapy. Indeed, the prognostic value of certain markers varies according to which therapy the patient receives. As such, these prognostic factors will require constant re-evaluation as agents with new mechanisms of action are added into the myeloma treatment algorithm. This article summarises current concepts of prognostic markers in myeloma.
在过去二十年中,由于采用了更新、更有效的疗法,多发性骨髓瘤(骨髓瘤)的治疗效果有了显著改善。但这种改善并不一致。对治疗的反应和生存率仍然存在异质性,一些患者存活1至2年,而另一些患者在10年后仍存活且无疾病进展。这种结果的差异归因于患者特征以及骨髓瘤肿瘤的内在特性。随着新型疗法的引入,人们对疾病生物学和耐药机制有了更深入的了解。这导致可用于骨髓瘤的预后标志物数量增加。这不仅对于更准确地向患者提供疾病预后咨询很重要,而且为风险适应性治疗铺平了道路。更新的和传统的预后标志物都需要在计划治疗的背景下使用。事实上,某些标志物的预后价值会因患者接受的治疗不同而有所变化。因此,随着具有新作用机制的药物被纳入骨髓瘤治疗方案,这些预后因素将需要不断重新评估。本文总结了骨髓瘤预后标志物的当前概念。