Hanemaayer Ariane
Department of Sociology, Brandon University, 270 - 18th Street, Brandon, MB, R7A 6A9, Canada.
J Med Humanit. 2016 Dec;37(4):449-473. doi: 10.1007/s10912-016-9398-0.
Debates about how knowledge is made and valued in evidence-based medicine (EBM) have yet to understand what discursive, social, and historical conditions allowed the EBM approach to stabilize and proliferate across western medical education. This paper uses a genealogical approach to examine the epistemological tensions that emerged as a result of various problematizations of uncertainty in medical practice. I explain how the problematization of uncertainty in the literature and the contingency of specific social, political, economic, and historical relations allowed the EBM approach to become a programmatic and pedagogical focus of the Faculty of Medicine at McMaster University and beyond.
关于循证医学(EBM)中知识如何形成及被重视的争论,尚未理解哪些话语、社会和历史条件使得循证医学方法在西方医学教育中得以稳定并扩散。本文采用谱系学方法,审视因医学实践中不确定性的各种问题化而产生的认识论张力。我将解释文献中不确定性的问题化以及特定社会、政治、经济和历史关系的偶然性,如何使循证医学方法成为麦克马斯特大学医学院及其他机构的一个纲领性和教学重点。