• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessing quality of a diagnostic test evaluation.

作者信息

Mulrow C D, Linn W D, Gaul M K, Pugh J A

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;4(4):288-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02597398.

DOI:10.1007/BF02597398
PMID:2760697
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a standardized scale for assessing the quality of a diagnostic test evaluation.

DESIGN

Fourteen participants with formal and practical experience in evaluating diagnostic tests formed a consensus panel. Panel members identified and weighted questions that should be addressed when assessing the quality of a diagnostic test evaluation.

SETTING

General internal medicine division at an academic medical center.

RESULTS

A 19-item weighted scale was developed. It prioritizes and addresses issues such as description of the proposed purpose of the test; appropriate selection and description of the study population; appropriate performance and description of the diagnostic test; appropriate selection and performance of the reference standard; and adequate presentation of test characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale is proposed as a useful instrument for readers, investigators, reviewers, and editors, because it represents an updated synthesis of important criteria to consider when evaluating diagnostic tests. It can also be used to rate quantitatively the quality of diagnostic test evaluations.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessing quality of a diagnostic test evaluation.
J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;4(4):288-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02597398.
2
3
An instrument for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation: development, evaluation, and inter-rater reliability.一种工作能力评估质量保证工具:开发、评估和评价者间信度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4387-4.
4
Development and evaluation of a standardized peer-training in the context of peer review for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation.制定和评估同行评审中标准化同行培训,以确保工作能力评估的质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1233-z.
5
6
7
Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.慢性下腰痛手术治疗中的决策:用于选择腰椎融合术患者的预后测试的效能
Acta Orthop Suppl. 2013 Feb;84(349):1-35. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.753565.
8
Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究质量评估方法的开发与验证
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jun;8(25):iii, 1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta8250.
9
[Assurance of process-quality in pulmonary practice by means of a peer-review system--a pilot project].通过同行评审系统确保肺部诊疗过程质量——一项试点项目
Pneumologie. 2006 Aug;60(8):485-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932212.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing strength of evidence in diagnostic tests.评估诊断测试中的证据力度。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jun;129(6):989e-998e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecd61.
2
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.诊断试验和策略的证据质量分级及推荐强度
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1106-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE.
3
Time for evidence-based cytology.基于证据的细胞学时代。

本文引用的文献

1
How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnostic test.如何阅读临床期刊:II. 了解一项诊断性检查。
Can Med Assoc J. 1981 Mar 15;124(6):703-10.
2
Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: groups, analysis and bias.冠心病运动试验的方法学问题:分组、分析与偏倚
Am J Cardiol. 1980 Nov;46(5):807-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90432-4.
3
The threshold approach to clinical decision making.临床决策的阈值方法。
Cytojournal. 2007 Jan 8;4:1. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-4-1.
4
Accuracy of clinical pallor in the diagnosis of anaemia in children: a meta-analysis.临床面色苍白在儿童贫血诊断中的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2005 Dec 8;5:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-46.
5
No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies.质量评分在诊断准确性研究的系统评价中无作用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 May 26;5:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-19.
6
Acute sinusitis in children: current treatment strategies.儿童急性鼻窦炎:当前的治疗策略
Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(2):71-80. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200305020-00001.
7
Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(4):301-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1012751326462.
8
Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.医疗保健中的系统评价:诊断和筛查试验评估的系统评价。
BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):157-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157.
9
Using the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio to detect prostate cancer in men with nonspecific elevations of prostate-specific antigen levels.利用游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原的比值,在前列腺特异性抗原水平非特异性升高的男性中检测前列腺癌。
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Oct;15(10):739-48. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.90907.x.
10
Reporting and concordance of methodologic criteria between abstracts and articles in diagnostic test studies.诊断试验研究中摘要与文章之间方法学标准的报告及一致性
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Mar;15(3):183-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.03189.x.
N Engl J Med. 1980 May 15;302(20):1109-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198005153022003.
4
Relations between effectiveness of a diagnostic test, prevalence of the disease, and percentages of uninterpretable results. An example in the diagnosis of jaundice.
Med Decis Making. 1982;2(3):285-97. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8200200305.
5
The limited spectrum of patients studied in exercise test research. Analyzing the tip of the iceberg.
JAMA. 1982 Nov 19;248(19):2467-70.
6
Metadiagnosis. An epistemologic model of clinical judgment.
Am J Med. 1983 Jul;75(1):129-37. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91176-2.
7
Evaluating the clinical efficacy of laboratory tests.评估实验室检查的临床疗效。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Jan;79(1):78-86. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/79.1.78.
8
The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research.诊断试验的评估。当前医学研究综述。
JAMA. 1984 Nov 2;252(17):2418-22.
9
Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications.诊断检查和程序的选择与解读。原理及应用。
Ann Intern Med. 1981 Apr;94(4 Pt 2):557-92.
10
Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations.未经过筛选的人群中单一诊断测试的预测价值。
N Engl J Med. 1966 May 26;274(21):1171-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196605262742104.