Ibrahim Andrew M, Ghaferi Amir A, Thumma Jyothi R, Dimick Justin B
Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):105-110. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001980.
To examine the relationship between hospital outcomes and expenditures in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the United States.
As one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States, bariatric surgery is a major focus of policy reforms aimed at reducing surgical costs. These policy mechanisms have made it imperative to understand the potential cost savings of quality-improvement initiatives.
We performed a retrospective review of 38,374 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgery between 2011 and 2013. We ranked hospitals into quintiles by their risk and reliability-adjusted postoperative serious complications. We then examined the relationship between upper and lower outcome quintiles with risk-adjusted total episode payments. Additionally, we stratified patients by their risk (low, medium, high) of developing a complication to understand how this impacted payment.
We found a strong correlation between hospital complication rates and episode payments. For example, hospitals in the lowest quintile of complication rates had average total episode payments that were $1321 per patient less than hospitals in the highest quintile ($11,112 vs $12,433; P < 0.005). Cost savings was more prominent amongst high-risk patients where the difference of total episode payments per patient between lowest and highest quintile hospitals was $2160 ($12,960 vs $15,120; P < 0.005). In addition to total episode payment savings, hospitals with the lowest complication rates also had decreased costs for index hospitalization, readmissions, physician services, and postdischarge ancillary care compared with hospitals with the highest complication rates.
Medicare payments for bariatric surgery are significantly lower at hospitals with low complication rates. These findings suggest that efforts to improve bariatric surgical quality may ultimately help reduce costs. Additionally, these cost savings may be most prominent amongst the patients at the highest risk for complications.
研究美国接受减肥手术患者的医院治疗结果与费用之间的关系。
减肥手术是美国最常见的外科手术之一,是旨在降低手术成本的政策改革的主要关注点。这些政策机制使得了解质量改进举措的潜在成本节约变得势在必行。
我们对2011年至2013年间接受减肥手术的38374名医疗保险受益人进行了回顾性研究。我们根据风险和可靠性调整后的术后严重并发症将医院分为五等份。然后,我们研究了结果最高和最低五等份与风险调整后的总疗程费用之间的关系。此外,我们根据患者发生并发症的风险(低、中、高)对患者进行分层,以了解这如何影响费用。
我们发现医院并发症发生率与疗程费用之间存在很强的相关性。例如,并发症发生率最低的五分之一医院的平均总疗程费用比最高的五分之一医院每名患者少1321美元(11112美元对12433美元;P<0.005)。在高风险患者中,成本节约更为显著,最低和最高五等份医院之间每名患者的总疗程费用差异为2160美元(12960美元对15120美元;P<0.005)。除了总疗程费用节约外,与并发症发生率最高的医院相比,并发症发生率最低的医院在首次住院、再入院、医生服务和出院后辅助护理方面的费用也有所降低。
并发症发生率低的医院,医疗保险支付的减肥手术费用显著较低。这些发现表明,提高减肥手术质量的努力最终可能有助于降低成本。此外,这些成本节约在并发症风险最高的患者中可能最为显著。