• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reoperation and Medicare Expenditures After Laparoscopic Gastric Band Surgery.腹腔镜胃束带手术后的再次手术与医疗保险支出
JAMA Surg. 2017 Sep 1;152(9):835-842. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1093.
2
Reoperations after gastric banding: replacement or alternative procedures?胃束带术后再次手术:更换手术还是采用替代手术?
Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):334-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9926-8. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
3
Impact of a National Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence Program on Medicare Expenditures.国家卓越减重手术中心项目对医疗保险支出的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Apr;20(4):708-14. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-3027-5. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
4
Association of Hospital Critical Access Status With Surgical Outcomes and Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医院关键通道状态与医疗保险受益人的手术结果和支出的关联。
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2095-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5618.
5
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal and outcome of subsequent revisional bariatric procedures: A retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients.腹腔镜可调节胃束带移除术及后续减重手术修正的结果:对214例连续患者的回顾性研究
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.068. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
6
Variation in Medicare Expenditures for Treating Perioperative Complications: The Cost of Rescue.治疗围手术期并发症的医疗保险支出差异:救援成本。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 21;151(12):e163340. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3340.
7
Variation in Outcomes at Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence.减重手术卓越中心的结果差异。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):629-636. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0542.
8
Analysis of reoperations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术后再次手术的分析
JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00210.
9
An Instrumental Variable Analysis Comparing Medicare Expenditures for Laparoscopic vs Open Colectomy.一项比较腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术医疗保险支出的工具变量分析。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 1;152(10):921-929. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1578.
10
Association of Bariatric Surgery Using Laparoscopic Banding, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Usual Care Obesity Management With All-Cause Mortality.采用腹腔镜束带术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的减重手术与常规肥胖管理对全因死亡率的影响。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 16;319(3):279-290. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20513.

引用本文的文献

1
Metabolic and bariatric surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: bibliometric analysis and visualisation from 1999 to 2023.代谢和减重手术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征:1999 年至 2023 年的文献计量分析和可视化。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):e089233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089233.
2
Endoscopic Management of Gastric Band Erosion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜治疗胃束带侵蚀:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Feb;34(2):494-502. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06995-4. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
3
Using video-based assessment (VBA) to document fellow improvement in safely completing the jejunojejunostomy portion of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.使用基于视频的评估(VBA)来记录同伴在安全完成腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路(RYGB)手术中的空肠空肠吻合部分的改进情况。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8853-8860. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10425-y. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
4
Weight Loss and Sleep, Current Evidence in Animal Models and Humans.体重减轻与睡眠:动物模型和人类的当前证据
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 3;15(15):3431. doi: 10.3390/nu15153431.
5
The durability of revisional sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after previous adjustable gastric band.先前接受可调节胃束带术后的翻修袖状胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的耐久性
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2326-2334. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09645-5. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Efficacy and Mechanisms of Gastric Volume-Restriction Bariatric Devices.胃容积限制型减肥器械的疗效及作用机制
Front Physiol. 2021 Oct 28;12:761481. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.761481. eCollection 2021.
7
Bariatric surgery outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的减肥手术结果。
Obes Sci Pract. 2020 Dec 22;7(2):176-191. doi: 10.1002/osp4.462. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Metabolic syndrome and liver disease in the era of bariatric surgery: What you need to know!减重手术时代的代谢综合征与肝脏疾病:你需要了解的内容!
World J Hepatol. 2020 Oct 27;12(10):709-721. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.709.
9
Bariatric Surgery Trends in the U.S.: 1% is the Loneliest Number.美国减肥手术趋势:1%是最孤独的数字。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):210-211. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003714.
10
Spine centers of excellence: applications for the ambulatory care setting.卓越脊柱中心:在门诊护理环境中的应用
J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep;5(Suppl 2):S133-S138. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.10.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital Quality and Medicare Expenditures for Bariatric Surgery in the United States.美国肥胖症手术的医院质量与医疗保险支出
Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):105-110. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001980.
2
Incidence and Risk Factors for Deliberate Self-harm, Mental Illness, and Suicide Following Bariatric Surgery: A State-wide Population-based Linked-data Cohort Study.减肥手术后蓄意自伤、精神疾病和自杀的发生率及风险因素:一项基于全州人口的关联数据队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):244-252. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001891.
3
Natural History of Adjustable Gastric Banding: Lifespan and Revisional Rate: A Nationwide Study on Administrative Data on 53,000 Patients.可调节胃束带术的自然史:寿命与翻修率:一项基于53000例患者行政数据的全国性研究
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):439-445. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001879.
4
Suicide, Self-harm, and Depression After Gastric Bypass Surgery: A Nationwide Cohort Study.胃旁路手术后的自杀、自我伤害与抑郁:一项全国性队列研究
Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):235-243. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001884.
5
Association of Hospital Critical Access Status With Surgical Outcomes and Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医院关键通道状态与医疗保险受益人的手术结果和支出的关联。
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2095-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5618.
6
Mental Health Conditions Among Patients Seeking and Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Meta-analysis.寻求和接受减肥手术患者的心理健康状况:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):150-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18118.
7
Self-harm Emergencies After Bariatric Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.减重手术后的自伤急诊:一项基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):226-32. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3414.
8
Reliability of hospital cost profiles in inpatient surgery.住院手术中医院成本概况的可靠性
Surgery. 2016 Feb;159(2):375-80. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.043. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
9
Lap band outcomes from 19,221 patients across centers and over a decade within the state of New York.纽约州内各中心在十年多时间里对19221名患者进行胃束带手术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1725-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4402-8. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
10
Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.医院参与质量报告项目与医疗保险受益人的手术结果及支出之间的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):496-504. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.25.

腹腔镜胃束带手术后的再次手术与医疗保险支出

Reoperation and Medicare Expenditures After Laparoscopic Gastric Band Surgery.

作者信息

Ibrahim Andrew M, Thumma Jyothi R, Dimick Justin B

机构信息

Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Surgical Innovation Editor.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2017 Sep 1;152(9):835-842. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1093.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1093
PMID:28514487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710463/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Following the US Food and Drug Administration approval for laparoscopic gastric band surgery in 2001, as many as 96 000 devices have been placed annually. The reported rates of reoperation range from 4% to 60% in short-term studies; however, to our knowledge, few long-term population-level data on outcomes or expenditures are known.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the rate of device-related reoperations occurring after laparoscopic gastric band surgery as well as the associated payments in a longitudinal national cohort.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective review of 25 042 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent gastric band placement between 2006 and 2013 identifies gastric band-related reoperations, including device removal, device replacement, or revision to a different bariatric procedure (eg, a gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy). The rates of reoperation were risk adjusted using a multivariable logistic regression model that included patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, Elixhauser comorbidities, and the year that the operation was performed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rate of device-related reoperation nationally and across individual hospital referral regions. Thirty-day total episode Medicare payments to hospitals for the index operation and any subsequent reoperations.

RESULTS

Of the 25 042 patients who underwent gastric band placement, 20 687 (82.61%) were white, 18 143 (72.45%) were women, and the mean age was 57.56 years. Patients (mean age, 57.5; 76.2% women) requiring reoperation had lower rates of hypertension (64.9% vs 73.4%; P < .001) and diabetes (40.4% vs 44.6%; P < .001) and were more likely to have their index operation at a for-profit hospital (34.6% vs 22.0%; P < .001). With an average of 4.5-year follow-up, 4636 patients (18.5%) underwent 17 539 reoperations (an average of 3.8 procedures/patient). Hospital referral regions demonstrated a 2.9-fold variation in risk- and reliability-adjusted rates of reoperation (lower quartile average, 13.3%; upper quartile average, 39.1%). During the study period, Medicare paid $470 million for laparoscopic gastric band associated procedures, of which $224 million (47.6%) of the payments were for reoperations. From 2006 to 2013, the proportion of payments from Medicare for reoperations increased from 16.4% to 77.3% of their annual spending on the gastric band device.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing gastric band surgery, device-related reoperation was common, costly, and varied widely across hospital referral regions. These findings suggest that payers should reconsider their coverage of the gastric band device.

摘要

重要性

2001年美国食品药品监督管理局批准腹腔镜胃束带手术之后,每年植入的器械多达96000个。短期研究报告的再次手术率在4%至60%之间;然而,据我们所知,关于结局或费用的长期人群水平数据却很少。

目的

描述腹腔镜胃束带手术后器械相关再次手术的发生率以及全国纵向队列中的相关费用。

设计、地点和参与者:这项对2006年至2013年间接受胃束带植入手术的25042名医疗保险受益人进行的回顾性研究,确定了与胃束带相关的再次手术,包括器械取出、器械更换或改为其他减肥手术(如胃旁路手术或袖状胃切除术)。使用多变量逻辑回归模型对再次手术率进行风险调整,该模型包括患者年龄、性别、种族/民族、埃利克斯豪泽合并症以及手术年份。

主要结局和指标

全国以及各个医院转诊地区器械相关再次手术的发生率。医疗保险为初次手术及任何后续再次手术向医院支付的30天总费用。

结果

在接受胃束带植入手术的25042名患者中,20687名(82.61%)为白人,18143名(72.45%)为女性,平均年龄为57.56岁。需要再次手术的患者(平均年龄57.5岁;76.2%为女性)高血压发病率较低(64.9%对73.4%;P<0.001),糖尿病发病率较低(40.4%对44.6%;P<0.001),且更有可能在营利性医院接受初次手术(34.6%对22.0%;P<0.001)。平均随访4.5年,4636名患者(18.5%)接受了17539次再次手术(平均每位患者3.8次手术)。医院转诊地区的风险和可靠性调整后的再次手术率存在2.9倍的差异(下四分位数平均值为13.3%;上四分位数平均值为39.1%)。在研究期间,医疗保险为腹腔镜胃束带相关手术支付了4.7亿美元,其中2.24亿美元(47.6%)用于再次手术。从2006年到2013年,医疗保险用于再次手术的支付比例从其每年在胃束带器械上的支出的16.4%增加到77.3%。

结论与意义

在接受胃束带手术的医疗保险受益人中,器械相关再次手术很常见,成本高昂,且在医院转诊地区差异很大。这些发现表明,支付方应重新考虑其对胃束带器械的覆盖范围。