Donvito Giulia, Wilkerson Jenny L, Damaj M Imad, Lichtman Aron H
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (G.D.; J.L.W.; M.I.D.; A.H.L.); and Department of Biotechnology and Bioscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (G.D.)
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (G.D.; J.L.W.; M.I.D.; A.H.L.); and Department of Biotechnology and Bioscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (G.D.).
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016 Nov;359(2):310-318. doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.236182. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) represents a serious complication associated with antineoplastic drugs. Although there are no medications available that effectively prevent CIPN, many classes of drugs have been used to treat this condition, including anticonvulsants, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and opioids. However, these therapeutic options yielded inconclusive results in CIPN clinical trials and produced assorted side effects with their prolonged use. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop efficacious and safe treatments for CIPN. In this report, we tested whether the endogenous lipid palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) alone or in combination with the anticonvulsant gabapentin would reduce allodynia in a mouse paclitaxel model of CIPN. Gabapentin and PEA reversed paclitaxel-induced allodynia with respective ED doses (95% confidence interval) of 67.4 (61.52-73.94) and 9.2 (8.39-10.16) mg/kg. Isobolographic analysis of these drugs in combination revealed synergistic antiallodynic effects. The PPAR-α antagonist receptor antagonist GW6471 [N-((2S)-2-(((1Z)-1-methyl-3-oxo-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)prop-1-enyl)amino)-3-(4-(2-(5-methyl-2-phenyl-1,3-oxazol-4-yl)ethoxy)phenyl)propyl)propanamide] completely blocked the antinociceptive effects of PEA. In addition, PEA administered via intraplantar injection into a paw, intrathecal injection, and intracerebroventricular injection reversed paclitaxel-induced allodynia, suggesting that it may act at multiple sites in the neuroaxis and periphery. Finally, repeated administration of PEA (30 mg/kg, 7 days) preserved the antiallodynic effects with no evidence of tolerance. These findings taken together suggest that PEA possesses potential to treat peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是一种与抗肿瘤药物相关的严重并发症。尽管目前尚无有效预防CIPN的药物,但许多类药物已被用于治疗这种疾病,包括抗惊厥药、5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂以及阿片类药物。然而,这些治疗选择在CIPN临床试验中产生了不确定的结果,并且长期使用会产生各种副作用。因此,迫切需要开发有效且安全的CIPN治疗方法。在本报告中,我们测试了内源性脂质棕榈酰乙醇酰胺(PEA)单独使用或与抗惊厥药加巴喷丁联合使用是否能减轻CIPN小鼠紫杉醇模型中的痛觉过敏。加巴喷丁和PEA分别以67.4(61.52 - 73.94)和9.2(8.39 - 10.16)mg/kg的ED剂量(95%置信区间)逆转了紫杉醇诱导的痛觉过敏。对这些联合使用的药物进行的等效应线图分析显示出协同的抗痛觉过敏作用。PPAR-α拮抗剂GW6471 [N - ((2S)-2 - ((((1Z)-1 - 甲基 - 3 - 氧代 - 3 - (4 - (三氟甲基)苯基)丙 - 1 - 烯基)氨基) - 3 - (4 - (2 - (5 - 甲基 - 2 - 苯基 - 1,3 - 恶唑 - 4 - 基)乙氧基)苯基)丙基)丙酰胺] 完全阻断了PEA的镇痛作用。此外,通过足底注射到爪部、鞘内注射和脑室内注射给予PEA均可逆转紫杉醇诱导的痛觉过敏,这表明它可能在神经轴和外周的多个部位起作用。最后,重复给予PEA(30 mg/kg,7天)可保持抗痛觉过敏作用,且无耐受性证据。综合这些发现表明,PEA具有治疗接受化疗的癌症患者周围神经病变的潜力。