Suppr超能文献

在一家截肢者康复诊所中,将智能平板电脑问卷与纸质问卷进行比较的可行性测试。

Feasibility testing of smart tablet questionnaires compared to paper questionnaires in an amputee rehabilitation clinic.

作者信息

Payne Michael, Janzen Shannon, Earl Eric, Deathe Barry, Viana Ricardo

机构信息

1 St. Joseph's Health Care London, Parkwood Institute, London, ON, Canada.

2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Aug;41(4):420-425. doi: 10.1177/0309364616661257. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Capturing the variability that exists among patients attending an amputee clinic using standardized paper-based questionnaires is time-consuming and may not be practical for routine clinical use. Electronic questionnaires are a potential solution; however, the benefits are dependent on the feasibility and acceptance of this mode of data collection among patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and patient preference/comfort in using a tablet-based questionnaire for data collection in an outpatient amputee rehabilitation clinic compared to a traditional paper-based questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study.

METHODS

In all, 48 patients with major extremity amputations completed both tablet and paper questionnaires related to their amputation and prosthetic use. Both trials were timed; patients then completed a semi-structured questionnaire about their experience.

RESULTS

In all, 20.5% of patients needed hands-on assistance completing the paper questionnaire compared to 20.8% for the tablet. The majority of participants (52.1%) indicated a preference for the tablet questionnaire; 64.6% of patients felt the tablet collected a more complete and accurate representation of their status and needs. In all, 70.8% of participants described themselves as comfortable using the tablet.

CONCLUSION

Despite comorbidities, patients with amputations demonstrated excellent acceptance of the electronic tablet-based questionnaire. Tablet questionnaires have significant potential advantages over paper questionnaires and should be further explored. Clinical relevance A custom electronic questionnaire was found to be beneficial for routine clinic use and was well received by patients in an amputee rehabilitation clinic. Development of such questionnaires can provide an efficient mechanism to collect meaningful data that can be used for individual patient care and program quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

背景

使用标准化纸质问卷收集截肢门诊患者之间存在的变异性很耗时,可能不适用于常规临床使用。电子问卷是一种潜在的解决方案;然而,其益处取决于这种数据收集方式在患者中的可行性和接受度。

目的

与传统纸质问卷相比,确定在门诊截肢康复诊所使用基于平板电脑的问卷进行数据收集的可行性以及患者的偏好/舒适度。

研究设计

观察性研究。

方法

共有48例大肢体截肢患者完成了与截肢和假肢使用相关的平板电脑问卷和纸质问卷。两项测试都记录了时间;然后患者完成了一份关于他们体验的半结构化问卷。

结果

总体而言,20.5%的患者在完成纸质问卷时需要实际帮助,而平板电脑问卷为20.8%。大多数参与者(52.1%)表示更喜欢平板电脑问卷;64.6%的患者认为平板电脑能更完整、准确地反映他们的状况和需求。总体而言,70.8%的参与者表示使用平板电脑很舒适。

结论

尽管存在合并症,但截肢患者对基于电子平板电脑的问卷表现出了极高的接受度。平板电脑问卷相对于纸质问卷具有显著的潜在优势,应进一步探索。临床相关性 发现定制电子问卷对常规诊所使用有益,并在截肢康复诊所中受到患者的好评。开发此类问卷可以提供一种有效的机制来收集有意义的数据,这些数据可用于个体患者护理和项目质量改进计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验