Martins Pereira Sandra, Teixeira Carla Margarida, Carvalho Ana Sofia, Hernández-Marrero Pablo
Instituto de Bioética, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.
Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 9;11(9):e0162340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162340. eCollection 2016.
Professionals working in intensive and palliative care units, hence caring for patients at the end-of-life, are at risk of developing burnout. Workplace conditions are determinant factors to develop this syndrome among professionals providing end-of-life care.
To identify and compare burnout levels between professionals working in intensive and palliative care units; and to assess which workplace experiences are associated with burnout.
A nationwide, multicentre quantitative comparative survey study was conducted in Portugal using the following instruments: Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, Questionnaire of workplace experiences and ethical decisions, and Questionnaire of socio-demographic and professional characteristics. A total of 355 professionals from 10 intensive care and 9 palliative care units participated in the survey. A series of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed; odds ratio sidelong with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
27% of the professionals exhibited burnout. This was more frequent in intensive care units (OR = 2.525, 95% CI: 1.025-6.221, p = .006). Univariate regression analyses showed that higher burnout levels were significantly associated with conflicts, decisions to withhold/withdraw treatment, and implementing palliative sedation. When controlling for socio-demographic and educational characteristics, and setting (intensive care units versus palliative care units), higher burnout levels were significantly and positively associated with experiencing conflicts in the workplace. Having post-graduate education in intensive/palliative care was significantly but inversely associated to higher burnout levels.
Compared to palliative care, working in intensive care units more than doubled the likelihood of exhibiting burnout. Experiencing conflicts (e.g., with patients and/or families, intra and/or inter-teams) was the most significant determinant of burnout and having post-graduate education in intensive/palliative care protected professionals from developing this syndrome. This highlights the need for promoting empowering workplace conditions, such as team empowerment and conflict management. Moreover, findings suggest the need for implementing quality improvement strategies and organizational redesign strategies aimed at integrating the philosophy, principles and practices of palliative care in intensive care units.
在重症监护和姑息治疗病房工作的专业人员,即负责临终患者护理的人员,面临职业倦怠的风险。工作场所条件是在提供临终护理的专业人员中出现这种综合征的决定性因素。
识别并比较重症监护和姑息治疗病房专业人员的职业倦怠水平;评估哪些工作场所经历与职业倦怠相关。
在葡萄牙进行了一项全国性、多中心的定量比较调查研究,使用以下工具:马氏职业倦怠量表-人类服务调查、工作场所经历和伦理决策问卷,以及社会人口统计学和专业特征问卷。来自10个重症监护病房和9个姑息治疗病房的355名专业人员参与了调查。进行了一系列单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析;计算了比值比及95%置信区间。
27%的专业人员表现出职业倦怠。在重症监护病房更为常见(比值比=2.525,95%置信区间:1.025-6.221,p=0.006)。单变量回归分析表明,较高的职业倦怠水平与冲突、停止/撤销治疗的决定以及实施姑息性镇静显著相关。在控制社会人口统计学和教育特征以及工作环境(重症监护病房与姑息治疗病房)后,较高的职业倦怠水平与工作场所的冲突显著正相关。在重症/姑息治疗方面接受研究生教育与较高的职业倦怠水平显著负相关。
与姑息治疗相比,在重症监护病房工作出现职业倦怠的可能性增加了一倍多。经历冲突(如与患者和/或家属、团队内部和/或团队之间)是职业倦怠的最主要决定因素,而在重症/姑息治疗方面接受研究生教育可保护专业人员不出现这种综合征。这凸显了促进赋能工作场所条件的必要性,如团队赋能和冲突管理。此外,研究结果表明需要实施质量改进策略和组织重新设计策略,旨在将姑息治疗的理念、原则和实践融入重症监护病房。