Napoli Niccolò, Kauffmann Emanuele F, Menonna Francesca, Perrone Vittorio Grazio, Brozzetti Stefania, Boggi Ugo
Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Pietro Valdoni Department of Surgery, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Updates Surg. 2016 Sep;68(3):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0387-7. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
Robotic assistance improves surgical dexterity in minimally invasive operations, especially when fine dissection and multiple sutures are required. As such, robotic assistance could be rewarding in the setting of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). RPD was implemented at a high volume center with preemptive experience in advanced laparoscopy. Indications, surgical technique, and results of RPD are discussed against the background of current literature. RPD was performed in 112 consecutive patients. Conversion to open surgery was required in three patients, despite nine required segmental resection and reconstruction of the superior mesenteric/portal vein. No patient was converted to laparoscopy. A pancreato-jejunostomy was created in 106 patients (94.6 %), using either a duct-to-mucosa (n = 82; 73.2 %) or an invaginating (n = 24; 21.4 %) technique. Pancreato-gastrostomy was performed in one patient, the pancreatic duct was occluded in two patients, and a pancreatico-cutaneous fistula was created in three patients. Mean operative time was 526.3 ± 102.4 in the entire cohort and reduced significantly over the course of time. Experience was also associated with reduced rates of delayed gastric emptying and increased proportion of malignant tumor histology. Ninety day mortality was 3.6 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 83 patients (74.1 %) with a median comprehensive complication index of 20.9 (0-30.8). Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in 19.6 % of the patients. No grade C pancreatic fistula was noted in the last 72 consecutive patients. RPD is safely feasible in selected patients. Implementation of RPD requires sound experience with open pancreatoduodenectomy and advanced laparoscopic procedures, as well as specific training with the robotic platform.
机器人辅助可提高微创手术中的手术灵活性,尤其是在需要精细解剖和多次缝合时。因此,机器人辅助在机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)中可能会有成效。RPD在一个对高级腹腔镜手术有先发经验的高容量中心实施。本文结合当前文献背景讨论了RPD的适应证、手术技术和结果。连续112例患者接受了RPD手术。3例患者需要转为开放手术,尽管有9例患者需要进行节段性切除并重建肠系膜上静脉/门静脉。没有患者转为腹腔镜手术。106例患者(94.6%)进行了胰空肠吻合术,采用导管对黏膜(n = 82;73.2%)或套入式(n = 24;21.4%)技术。1例患者进行了胰胃吻合术,2例患者胰管闭塞,3例患者形成了胰皮瘘。整个队列的平均手术时间为526.3±102.4分钟,且随着时间的推移显著缩短。经验积累还与胃排空延迟率降低和恶性肿瘤组织学比例增加有关。90天死亡率为3.6%。83例患者(74.1%)发生了术后并发症,综合并发症指数中位数为20.9(0 - 30.8)。19.6%的患者发生了临床相关的胰瘘。在最近连续72例患者中未发现C级胰瘘。RPD在选定患者中安全可行。实施RPD需要有开放胰十二指肠切除术和高级腹腔镜手术的扎实经验,以及机器人平台的专项培训。