Dipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 26, I-20133, Milano, Italy.
Ecologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1582-1600. doi: 10.1111/brv.12297. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
Sexual selection arises from competition among individuals for access to mates, resulting in the evolution of conspicuous sexually selected traits, especially when inter-sexual competition is mediated by mate choice. Different sexual selection regimes may occur among populations/subspecies within the same species. This is particularly the case when mate choice is based on multiple sexually selected traits. However, empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis at the among-populations level is scarce. We conducted a meta-analysis of the intensity of sexual selection on the largest database to date for a single species, the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica), relying on quantitative estimates of sexual selection. The intensity of sexual selection was expressed as the strength (effect size) of the relationships between six plumage ornaments (tail length, tail asymmetry, size of white spots on tail, ventral plumage colour, throat plumage colour and throat patch size) and several fitness proxies related to reproduction, parental care, offspring quality, arrival date from spring migration, and survival. The data were gathered for four geographically separated subspecies (H. r. rustica, H. r. erythrogaster, H. r. gutturalis, H. r. transitiva). The overall mean effect size (Z = 0.214; 95% confidence interval = 0.175-0.254; N = 329) was of intermediate magnitude, with intensity of sexual selection being stronger in males than in females. Effect sizes varied during the breeding cycle, being larger before egg deposition, when competition for access to mates reaches its maximum (i.e. in the promiscuous part of the breeding cycle), and decreasing thereafter. In addition, effect sizes from experiments were not significantly larger than those from correlative studies. Finally, sexual selection on different sexually dimorphic traits varied among subspecies. This last result suggests that morphological divergence among populations has partly arisen from divergent sexual selection, which may eventually lead to speciation.
性选择源于个体之间为获得配偶而进行的竞争,导致明显的性选择特征进化,特别是当种间竞争由配偶选择介导时。同一物种的不同种群/亚种之间可能存在不同的性选择模式。当配偶选择基于多个性选择特征时,尤其如此。然而,在种群间水平上支持这一假设的经验证据很少。我们对迄今为止最大的单一物种数据库(家燕(Hirundo rustica))进行了性选择强度的荟萃分析,该数据库依赖于性选择的定量估计。性选择的强度表示为六个羽毛装饰物(尾巴长度、尾巴不对称、尾巴上白色斑点的大小、腹部羽毛颜色、喉咙羽毛颜色和喉咙斑块大小)与几个与繁殖、亲代养育、后代质量、春季迁徙到达日期和生存相关的适应度代理之间关系的强度(效应大小)。这些数据是为四个地理上分离的亚种(H. r. rustica、H. r. erythrogaster、H. r. gutturalis、H. r. transitiva)收集的。总体平均效应大小(Z=0.214;95%置信区间=0.175-0.254;N=329)为中等大小,雄性的性选择强度强于雌性。在繁殖周期中,效应大小会发生变化,在产卵前最大(即繁殖周期的滥交部分),竞争获得配偶达到最大时,效应大小较大,此后减小。此外,实验得出的效应大小并不明显大于相关研究得出的效应大小。最后,不同性别二态性特征的性选择在亚种之间存在差异。最后一个结果表明,种群之间的形态分歧部分是由于不同的性选择而产生的,这最终可能导致物种形成。