Day Michael, Phil M, McCormack Richard A, Nayyar Samir, Jazrawi Laith
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2016 Sep;74(3):207-11.
Ultrasonography offers a fast and inexpensive method to evaluate the rotator cuff in the office setting. However, the accuracy of ultrasound is highly user dependent. The purpose of this study is to investigate the learning curve of an orthopaedic surgeon in using ultrasound to diagnose rotator cuff tears.
A sports medicine fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeon was taught how to perform and interpret an ultrasound examination of the shoulder by a musculoskeletal radiologist. In this prospective study, subjects were patients who presented to the office with shoulder pain suspected to be consistent with rotator cuff pathology, either complete or partial tears. The surgeon was blinded to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results and performed the ultrasound after performing a physical exam. Based on ultrasound and exam, the surgeon assessed if the rotator cuff was intact (no tear) or torn (having a partial or full thickness tear). Results were compared to MRI findings and arthroscopic findings (when available), and accuracy was evaluated over time to determine overall accuracy and if significant learning and improvement in accuracy took place over the time period studied.
Eighty patients were enrolled in the study; seventy-four had an MRI within 3 months of the ultrasound and were available for evaluation. Nineteen patients underwent ultrasound, MRI, and arthroscopy. Ultrasound was able to accurately diagnose the correct rotator cuff pathology (no tear, a partial thickness tear, or a full thickness tear) in 61% of patients. Ultrasound accurately diagnosed simply the presence or absence of a tear in 74% of patients. There was a general trend toward improved accuracy as the investigator gained experience, with accuracy rates of approximately 51% for the first 40 patients, and 69% for the last 40 patients evaluated, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.154).
Ultrasound imaging requires significant training and practice to provide a clinically useful level of diagnostic accuracy. The applicability of this procedure for diagnosing primary rotator cuff tears in an orthopaedic office setting may be limited by the time and volume required for the practitioner to approach the accuracy reported for diagnostic ultrasound and MRI in the literature.
超声检查为在门诊环境中评估肩袖提供了一种快速且经济的方法。然而,超声的准确性高度依赖于使用者。本研究的目的是调查骨科医生使用超声诊断肩袖撕裂的学习曲线。
一名接受过运动医学 fellowship 培训的骨科医生由一名肌肉骨骼放射科医生教授如何进行和解读肩部超声检查。在这项前瞻性研究中,受试者为因肩部疼痛前来门诊就诊、疑似患有肩袖病变(完全或部分撕裂)的患者。该医生对磁共振成像(MRI)结果不知情,并在进行体格检查后进行超声检查。基于超声和体格检查,该医生评估肩袖是否完整(无撕裂)或撕裂(有部分或全层厚度撕裂)。将结果与 MRI 结果和关节镜检查结果(如有)进行比较,并随时间评估准确性,以确定总体准确性以及在所研究的时间段内准确性是否有显著的学习和提高。
80 名患者纳入本研究;74 名患者在超声检查后 3 个月内进行了 MRI 检查且可供评估。19 名患者接受了超声、MRI 和关节镜检查。超声能够在 61%的患者中准确诊断出正确的肩袖病变(无撕裂、部分厚度撕裂或全层厚度撕裂)。超声在 74%的患者中准确诊断出是否存在撕裂。随着研究者经验的增加,准确性总体上有提高的趋势,前 40 名患者的准确率约为 51%,最后评估的 40 名患者的准确率为 69%,尽管这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.154)。
超声成像需要大量的培训和实践才能提供具有临床实用性的诊断准确性水平。在骨科门诊环境中,该程序用于诊断原发性肩袖撕裂的适用性可能受到从业者达到文献中报道的诊断超声和 MRI 准确性所需的时间和病例数量的限制。