Ribadier A, Varescon I
Équipe de psychopathologie des addictions et des émotions, laboratoire de psychopathologie et processus de santé, EA 4057 (LPPS), institut de psychologie, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 71, avenue Edouard-Vaillant, 92774 Boulogne-Billancourt cedex, France.
Équipe de psychopathologie des addictions et des émotions, laboratoire de psychopathologie et processus de santé, EA 4057 (LPPS), institut de psychologie, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 71, avenue Edouard-Vaillant, 92774 Boulogne-Billancourt cedex, France.
Encephale. 2017 May;43(3):223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
Defense mechanisms have been seen to greatly change over time and across different definitions made by different theoretical currents. Recently with the definition provided by the DSM IV, defense mechanisms have integrated the concept of coping as a defensive factor. These mechanisms are no longer considered just through a psychodynamic approach but also through a cognitive and behavioral one. In recent years, new theories have therefore integrated these two components of the defensive operation. According to Chabrol and Callahan (2013), defense mechanisms precede coping strategies. In individuals with psychopathological disorders, these authors indicate a relative stability of these mechanisms. Also, we asked about the presence of unique characteristics among people with alcohol dependence. Indeed, studies conducted with people with alcohol dependence highlight the presence of a neurotic defense style and some highly immature defenses (projection, acting out, splitting and somatization). In terms of coping strategies, persons with alcohol dependence preferentially use avoidant strategies and strategies focused on emotion. However, although several studies have been conducted to assess coping strategies and defense styles within a population of individuals with an alcohol problem, at the present time none of them has taken into account all these aspects of defense mechanisms.
The aim of this study is therefore to study the defenses and defense styles and coping strategies in an alcohol-dependent population.
This multicenter study (3 CHU, 1 center of supportive care and prevention in addiction and 1 clinic) received a favorable opinion of an Institutional Review Board (IRB Registration #: 00001072). Eighty alcohol-dependent individuals responded to a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics and elements related to the course of consumption. Coping strategies were assessed by means of a questionnaire validated in French: the Brief Cope. The Defense Style Questionnaire-40 translated into French, but not validated, assessed defenses and defense style. Descriptive, comparative and correlational analysis was carried out using Statistica software - version 10.
The alcohol-dependent people preferentially use emotion focused coping blame and less the problem focused coping humor. The highest immature defense is acting out. Correlational analyses confirm the presence of some significant relationships between defense style and some coping strategies. Thus, the mature style is the only defense style, which is linked with the problem focused strategy humor, and another one coping called distraction. Some singular relationships were found with these two dimensions of coping. Alcohol and drug disengagement show particularly strong relationships with immature defenses such as projection and somatization. Another singular result is indicated by a negative relationship between immature defenses autistic fantasy with the strategy expression of feelings.
This study found a significant number of relationships between defensive styles, defenses and coping strategies. This research also highlights the value of an integrative approach of defense mechanisms for the analysis of defensive functioning of people with alcohol dependence. Indeed, the relationships between these elements are consistent and allow understanding the defensive operation as a whole to promote a new adapted means of support.
防御机制已被视为会随着时间推移以及不同理论流派给出的不同定义而发生巨大变化。最近,根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)给出的定义,防御机制已将应对概念纳入其中作为一个防御因素。这些机制不再仅仅通过心理动力学方法来考量,还通过认知和行为方法来考量。因此,近年来新理论已将防御运作的这两个组成部分整合起来。根据沙布罗尔和卡拉汉(2013年)的观点,防御机制先于应对策略。在患有精神病理学障碍的个体中,这些作者指出这些机制具有相对稳定性。此外,我们还探究了酒精依赖者中是否存在独特特征。的确,对酒精依赖者进行的研究凸显出存在一种神经质防御风格以及一些高度不成熟的防御方式(投射、付诸行动、分裂和躯体化)。在应对策略方面,酒精依赖者优先使用回避策略和聚焦情绪的策略。然而,尽管已经开展了多项研究来评估有酒精问题人群的应对策略和防御风格,但目前尚无一项研究考虑到防御机制的所有这些方面。
因此,本研究的目的是探究酒精依赖人群的防御方式、防御机制和应对策略。
这项多中心研究(3家大学医院、1家成瘾支持护理与预防中心和1家诊所)获得了机构审查委员会的批准(机构审查委员会注册号:00001072)。80名酒精依赖者回答了一份评估社会人口学特征以及与饮酒过程相关因素的问卷。应对策略通过一份已在法语中验证的问卷《简易应对方式问卷》进行评估。翻译成法语但未经验证的《防御方式问卷-40》评估了防御机制和防御方式。使用Statistica软件10版进行描述性、比较性和相关性分析。
酒精依赖者优先使用聚焦情绪的应对方式自责较少使用聚焦问题的应对方式幽默。最高的不成熟防御方式是付诸行动。相关性分析证实了防御方式与某些应对策略之间存在一些显著关系。因此,成熟型是唯一与聚焦问题的策略幽默以及另一种称为分心的应对方式相关联的防御方式。在应对的这两个维度上发现了一些独特关系。戒酒和戒毒与诸如投射和躯体化等不成熟防御方式呈现出特别强的关系。另一个独特结果是不成熟防御方式自闭症幻想与情感表达策略之间呈负相关。
本研究发现防御方式、防御机制和应对策略之间存在大量关系。这项研究还凸显了采用综合方法分析防御机制对于理解酒精依赖者防御功能的价值。的确,这些要素之间的关系是一致的,有助于从整体上理解防御运作,从而推动形成一种新的适应性支持方式。