Duncan Markus J, Arbour-Nicitopoulos Kelly, Subramanieapillai Mehala, Remington Gary, Faulkner Guy
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Schizophr Res. 2017 Jan;179:2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
Individuals with schizophrenia tend to have low levels of physical activity (PA) which contributes to high rates of physical comorbidities. Valid and reliable methods of assessing PA are essential for advancing health research. Ten years after initial validation of the Short-Form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), this study expands on the initial validation study by examining retest reliability over a 4-week period, assessing validity with a larger sample, and comparing validity of the IPAQ to a 24-hour recall alternative.
Participants completed the IPAQ at baseline and 4weeks later, along with a 24-hour PA recall at week 4. At week 3 participants wore waist accelerometers for 7days. Spearman's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were calculated based on weekly minutes of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA).
Test-retest reliability for the self-administered IPAQ was ρ=0.47, p<0.001 for MVPA. Correlation between IPAQ assessment and accelerometer-determined MVPA was ρ=0.30, p=0.003. The 24-hour recall correlated significantly with MVPA on the previous day ρ=0.27, p=0.012. A Bland-Altman plot indicated the IPAQ-SF underreported by -119.2min (-72%) on average compared to accelerometry (95% limits of agreement -1017.1 to 778.7min, -292% to 147%).
Compared to previous IPAQ validation work in this population, criterion validity was similar, but reliability was lower over a 4-week period. MVPA criterion validity of the 24-hour recall was comparable to the 7-day self-report IPAQ. Findings further support that the IPAQ is a suitable assessment tool for epidemiological studies. Objective measures of physical activity are recommended for intervention assessment.
精神分裂症患者往往身体活动(PA)水平较低,这导致了较高的躯体合并症发生率。有效的PA评估方法对于推进健康研究至关重要。在国际体力活动简短问卷(IPAQ)首次验证十年后,本研究通过检查4周期间的重测信度、用更大样本评估效度以及将IPAQ的效度与24小时回顾法进行比较,对最初的验证研究进行了拓展。
参与者在基线时和4周后完成IPAQ,同时在第4周进行24小时PA回顾。在第3周,参与者佩戴腰部加速度计7天。基于每周中度至剧烈PA(MVPA)的分钟数计算Spearman相关系数和Bland-Altman图。
自我管理的IPAQ的重测信度对于MVPA为ρ = 0.47,p < 0.001。IPAQ评估与加速度计测定的MVPA之间的相关性为ρ = 0.30,p = 0.003。24小时回顾与前一天的MVPA显著相关,ρ = 0.27,p = 0.012。Bland-Altman图表明,与加速度计相比,IPAQ-SF平均少报了-119.2分钟(-72%)(一致性界限95%为-1017.1至778.7分钟,-292%至147%)。
与该人群之前的IPAQ验证工作相比,效标效度相似,但在4周期间信度较低。24小时回顾法的MVPA效标效度与7天自我报告的IPAQ相当。研究结果进一步支持IPAQ是流行病学研究的合适评估工具。建议使用客观的体力活动测量方法进行干预评估。