Suppr超能文献

ICD风险分层研究——欧盟心脏再同步化治疗除颤器注册研究及欧洲视角

ICD risk stratification studies - EU-CERT-ICD and the European perspective.

作者信息

Seegers Joachim, Bergau Leonard, Tichelbäcker Tobias, Malik Marek, Zabel Markus

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Division of Clinical Electrophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Division of Clinical Electrophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2016 Nov-Dec;49(6):831-836. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

In patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction, treatment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been shown to improve survival and guidelines recommend their use for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Experts disagree regarding the validity of decade-old trial results as the basis for this recommendation, therefore, reconsideration of prophylactic ICD treatment is needed.

EU-CERT-ICD, DANISH-ICD AND DO-IT: In order to update the evidence on prophylactic ICD treatment, several prospective studies are underway in Europe. The prospective EU-CERT-ICD cohort study (NCT 02064192) is enrolling 2500 patients and compares patients undergoing first ICD implantation with controls with an earlier clinical decision to go without ICD implantation strictly unrelated to the study. The DANISH ICD study (NCT 00542945) has randomized 1000 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and an LVEF ≤35% (1:1 ICD implantation vs. control). The prospective DO-IT multicenter registry will include 1500 ICD patients in multiple Dutch high-volume implanting centers. Due to the widespread use of ICD therapy, new randomized trials seem not straightforward to envisage in many countries.

CONCLUSION

The above described ICD studies will provide additional evidence regarding the effectiveness of primary prophylactic ICDs in Europe and may have an impact on ICD treatment guidelines. They could also help to design randomized trials in low risk patients.

摘要

背景与理论依据

对于缺血性或非缺血性心肌病且左心室射血分数降低的患者,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗已被证明可提高生存率,并且指南推荐将其用于心脏性猝死的一级预防。专家们对于以十年前的试验结果作为该推荐的依据的有效性存在分歧,因此,需要重新考虑预防性ICD治疗。

欧盟ICD验证研究(EU-CERT-ICD)、丹麦ICD研究(DANISH-ICD)与荷兰ICD植入技术研究(DO-IT):为了更新预防性ICD治疗的证据,欧洲正在进行多项前瞻性研究。前瞻性的欧盟ICD验证队列研究(NCT 02064192)正在招募2500名患者,并将首次植入ICD的患者与那些因与研究完全无关而较早临床决定不植入ICD的对照组进行比较。丹麦ICD研究(NCT 00542945)已将1000名扩张型心肌病且左心室射血分数≤35%的患者随机分组(1:1植入ICD与对照组)。前瞻性的荷兰ICD植入技术多中心注册研究将纳入荷兰多个高植入量中心的1500名ICD患者。由于ICD治疗的广泛应用,在许多国家似乎难以设想开展新的随机试验。

结论

上述ICD研究将为欧洲原发性预防性ICD的有效性提供更多证据,可能会对ICD治疗指南产生影响。它们还可能有助于设计针对低风险患者的随机试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验