Hanawa S
Shikwa Gakuho. 1989 Jan;89(1):94-126.
Proplast I, Proplast II and freeze-dried homogenous cartilage (1 x 2 x 5 mm) were implanted under and over the rabbit mandibular periosteum. Histological observations and contact microradiography (CMR) were performed to investigate the healing process in the surgical sites from 1 to 24 weeks after the operation. In addition, microangiography (MA) was carried out to investigate changes of vascularization in the groups in which Proplast implants were made. Results 1. Proplast implantation group 1) In the supraperiosteal placement group, CMR revealed no new bone formation around or inside the Proplast and no morphological changes of the host bone in contact with the Proplast. In the subperiosteal placement group, from the early postoperative stage, new bone formation occurred from the host bone beside the Proplast. New bone penetrated the Proplast from the new bone region and from the host bone in contact with the Proplast. In 6 months after the operation, Almost all Proplast pores were filled with new bone. From a comparatively early postoperative stage, resorption fossae appeared in the host bone surface. In addition, Haversian canals inside the host bone enlarged and the host bone cortex gradually grew thinner. No differences in new bone volume or host bone changes were noticed between the Proplast I and Proplast II groups. 2) In the supraperiosteal placement group, granulation tissue proliferation with slight round cell infiltration was observed around and inside the Proplast at an early stage. In 2 weeks after the operation, blood clots disappeared from the Proplast, in the center of which granulation tissue proliferated. Thereafter, granulation tissue was gradually transformed into fibrous tissue, although no new bone was observed in any region. Change almost never occurred in the host bone cortex, but slight swelling occurred in the periosteum in contact with the Proplast after 1 week. 3) In the subperiosteal placement group, swelling and slight round cell infiltration were observed in the periosteum covering the Proplast at an early postoperative stage. But, after 4 months, the periosteum had returned to normal condition. Beside and inside the Proplast, rapid granulation tissue proliferation and new bone formation were observed. New bone formation was observed beside the host bone, but not beside the periosteum. For a comparatively long time, resorbed fossae in the host bone surface and enlarged Haversian canals persisted. Host bone width gradually decreased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
将I型普罗普拉斯、II型普罗普拉斯和冻干同种异体软骨(1×2×5毫米)植入兔下颌骨骨膜下和骨膜上。术后1至24周,进行组织学观察和接触式微放射摄影(CMR)以研究手术部位的愈合过程。此外,进行微血管造影(MA)以研究植入普罗普拉斯的组中的血管化变化。结果1. 普罗普拉斯植入组1)在骨膜上放置组中,CMR显示普罗普拉斯周围或内部没有新骨形成,与普罗普拉斯接触的宿主骨没有形态学变化。在骨膜下放置组中,从术后早期开始,普罗普拉斯旁边的宿主骨出现新骨形成。新骨从新骨区域和与普罗普拉斯接触的宿主骨穿透普罗普拉斯。术后6个月,几乎所有普罗普拉斯孔隙都被新骨填充。从术后相对早期开始,宿主骨表面出现吸收窝。此外,宿主骨内的哈弗斯管扩大,宿主骨皮质逐渐变薄。I型普罗普拉斯组和II型普罗普拉斯组之间在新骨体积或宿主骨变化方面没有差异。2)在骨膜上放置组中,早期在普罗普拉斯周围和内部观察到肉芽组织增生伴有轻微的圆形细胞浸润。术后2周,普罗普拉斯中的血凝块消失,其中心肉芽组织增生。此后,肉芽组织逐渐转化为纤维组织,尽管在任何区域都未观察到新骨。宿主骨皮质几乎没有变化,但术后1周与普罗普拉斯接触的骨膜出现轻微肿胀。3)在骨膜下放置组中,术后早期在覆盖普罗普拉斯的骨膜中观察到肿胀和轻微的圆形细胞浸润。但是,4个月后,骨膜恢复正常状态。在普罗普拉斯旁边和内部,观察到肉芽组织快速增生和新骨形成。在宿主骨旁边观察到新骨形成,但在骨膜旁边未观察到。在相当长的一段时间内,宿主骨表面的吸收窝和扩大的哈弗斯管持续存在。宿主骨宽度逐渐减小。(摘要截断于400字)