• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期与标准疗程双联抗血小板治疗的系统评价、Meta分析及Meta回归分析:一项随机对照试验研究

Short Duration vs Standard Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Wassef Anthony W A, Khafaji Hadi, Syed Ishba, Yan Andrew T, Udell Jacob A, Goodman Shaun G, Cheema Asim N, Bagai Akshay

机构信息

Terrence Donnelly Heart Center, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Dec;28(12):E203-E210. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

PMID:27630146
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Whether the duration of DAPT can be safely shortened with use of second-generation DESs is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short duration (SD) (3-6 months) with standard longer duration (LD) (≥12 months) DAPT in patients treated with primarily second-generation DES implantation. Meta-regression was performed to explore the relationship between acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the effect of DAPT duration.

RESULTS

Six studies were included, with 12,752/13,928 (91.5%) patients receiving second-generation DESs. A total of 5367 patients (39%) had PCI in the setting of ACS. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (1.1% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.18; P=.36) or cardiac mortality (0.9% vs 1.0%; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61-1.39; P=.69) with SD-DAPT vs LD-DAPT, respectively. Definite/probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs 0.3%; OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.75-2.34; P=.51), myocardial infarction (1.5% vs 1.3%; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88-1.56; P=.29), and stroke (0.4% vs 0.4%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.60-1.81; P=.88) were similar between the groups. Compared with LD-DAPT, SD-DAPT was associated with lower clinically significant bleeding (0.9% vs 1.4%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.89; P=.01). Meta-regression analysis showed no significant association between the proportion of ACS patients in trials and duration of DAPT for the outcomes of mortality (P=.95), myocardial infarction (P=.98), or stent thrombosis (P=.89).

CONCLUSION

In low-risk patients treated with contemporary second-generation DES implantation, SD-DAPT has similar rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, with lower rates of bleeding compared with LD-DAPT.

摘要

背景

当前指南推荐在药物洗脱支架(DES)植入的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后进行12个月的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)。使用第二代DES时DAPT疗程能否安全缩短尚不清楚。

方法

我们对主要接受第二代DES植入治疗的患者中比较短疗程(SD)(3 - 6个月)与标准长疗程(LD)(≥12个月)DAPT的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。进行了荟萃回归以探讨急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)与DAPT疗程效果之间的关系。

结果

纳入了6项研究,12752/13928(91.5%)例患者接受第二代DES。共有5367例患者(39%)在ACS情况下接受了PCI。SD - DAPT与LD - DAPT相比,全因死亡率(1.1%对1.2%;优势比[OR],0.86;95%置信区间[CI],0.63 - 1.18;P = 0.36)或心脏死亡率(0.9%对1.0%;OR,0.92;95% CI,0.61 - 1.39;P = 0.69)无差异。明确/可能的支架血栓形成(0.5%对0.3%;OR,1.33;95% CI,0.75 - 2.34;P = 0.51)、心肌梗死(1.5%对1.3%;OR,1.17;95% CI,0.88 - 1.56;P = 0.29)和中风(0.4%对0.4%;OR,1.04;95% CI,0.60 - 1.81;P = 0.88)在两组之间相似。与LD - DAPT相比,SD - DAPT与较低的临床显著出血相关(0.9%对1.4%;OR,0.64;95% CI,0.46 - 0.89;P = 0.01)。荟萃回归分析显示,试验中ACS患者的比例与DAPT疗程对死亡率(P = 0.95)、心肌梗死(P = 0.98)或支架血栓形成(P = 0.89)结局之间无显著关联。

结论

在接受当代第二代DES植入治疗的低风险患者中,SD - DAPT的死亡率、心肌梗死和支架血栓形成发生率相似,与LD - DAPT相比出血率较低。

相似文献

1
Short Duration vs Standard Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期与标准疗程双联抗血小板治疗的系统评价、Meta分析及Meta回归分析:一项随机对照试验研究
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Dec;28(12):E203-E210. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
2
Safety of an abbreviated duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (≤6 months) following second-generation drug-eluting stents for coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.第二代药物洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病后短期双联抗血小板治疗(≤6个月)的安全性:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;87(4):722-732. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26110. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
3
Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Drug-Eluting Stents: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.药物洗脱支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗的最佳持续时间:随机试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;33(5):253-63. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12137.
4
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后双联抗血小板治疗的时间:糖尿病与非糖尿病患者随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jan-Feb;60(4-5):500-507. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
5
Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗的时间:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 7;65(13):1298-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.039. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
Short dual antiplatelet therapy followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗继以 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后延长双联抗血小板治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 21;42(4):308-319. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa739.
7
Short- versus standard-term dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架植入后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中短期与标准疗程双重抗血小板治疗的荟萃分析。
J Cardiol. 2017 Jan;69(1):353-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
8
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗的疗程:针对2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗疗程重点更新指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e156-78. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000405. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Benefits of short-term or prolonged as compared to standard 1 year DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials.与标准的 1 年 DAPT 相比,急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受药物洗脱支架治疗后短期或长期 DAPT 的获益:9 项随机试验的荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Aug;50(2):337-354. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-02033-2.
10
The optimal discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者双联抗血小板治疗的最佳停药时机:随机试验的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 15;235:73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.091. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiplatelet Strategy for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的抗血小板策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e032490. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.032490. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Antithrombotic Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the CONNECT AF+PCI Study.心房颤动患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗栓治疗:CONNECT AF+PCI研究结果
CJC Open. 2021 Jul 6;3(12):1419-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.07.003. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Oral Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome.
急性冠状动脉综合征二级预防的口服抗血小板治疗。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Dec;18(6):457-472. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0291-2.