Suppr超能文献

开放性修复与经皮修复治疗急性跟腱断裂的疗效比较

The Effectiveness of Open Repair Versus Percutaneous Repair for an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture.

作者信息

Krueger Heidi, David Shannon

出版信息

J Sport Rehabil. 2016 Dec;25(4):404-410. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0024. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

Abstract

Clinical Scenario: There are 2 approaches available for surgical repair of the Achilles tendon: open or percutaneous. However, there is controversy over which repair is superior. Focused Clinical Question: Which type of surgery is better in providing the best overall patient outcome, open or percutaneous repair, in physically active men and women with acute Achilles tendon ruptures? Summary of Search, "Best Evidence" Appraised, and Key Findings: The literature was searched for studies of level 3 evidence or higher that investigated the effectiveness of open repair versus percutaneous repair on acute Achilles tendon ruptures in physically active men and women. The literature search resulted in 3 studies for possible inclusion. All 3 good-quality studies were included. Clinical Bottom Line: There is supporting evidence to indicate that percutaneous repair is the best option for Achilles tendon surgery when it comes to the physically active population. Percutaneous repair has faster surgery times, less risk of complications, and faster recovery times over having an open repair, although it is acknowledged that every patient has a different situation and best individual option may vary patient to patient.

摘要

临床案例

跟腱手术修复有两种方法:开放手术或经皮手术。然而,哪种修复方法更优存在争议。重点临床问题:对于急性跟腱断裂的活跃男性和女性,哪种手术类型能提供最佳的总体患者预后,开放手术还是经皮修复?检索总结、“最佳证据”评估及主要发现:检索文献,寻找三级或更高证据水平的研究,这些研究调查了开放修复与经皮修复对活跃男性和女性急性跟腱断裂的有效性。文献检索得到3项可能纳入的研究。所有3项高质量研究均被纳入。临床要点:有支持性证据表明,对于活跃人群,经皮修复是跟腱手术的最佳选择。经皮修复手术时间更快,并发症风险更低,恢复时间比开放手术更快,不过公认每个患者情况不同,最佳个体选择可能因患者而异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验