Saltan Asuman, Ankarali Handan
J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Jul;26(4):287-293. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0054. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
To compare classification levels and trunk stabilization of wheelchair basketball players and to identify their norm values of trunk balance.
113 wheelchair basketball players in the super and first Turkish leagues.
A modified Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) (version 4.1) was used to evaluate trunk stabilization. Two skills were chosen that correspond to the stationary wheelie activity in WST, the 30-s stationary wheelie and stationary wheelie in 180°.
There are no statistical differences between WST rates and point means.
The skills and success and safety rates of the players with 1.5 points (51.9%, 44.4%) were lower than those of the players with 1.0 point (70%, 66.7%). In players with 2.5 and 2.0 points, the most successful and safest percentage values were 78.6%, 78.6% and 82.1%, 75%.
Although it is expected that trunk stabilization would be better in players with high points, in our study we encountered conflicting results between the points and sitting balance or trunk stabilization. Our study supports the studies in the literature suggesting modifications in the functional-classification system.
比较轮椅篮球运动员的分级水平和躯干稳定性，并确定他们躯干平衡的正常值。
土耳其超级联赛和一级联赛中的113名轮椅篮球运动员。
采用改良的轮椅技能测试（WST）（4.1版）评估躯干稳定性。选择了两项与WST中的静止前轮抬起活动相对应的技能，即30秒静止前轮抬起和180°静止前轮抬起。
WST评分和平均分之间无统计学差异。
得1.5分的运动员的技能、成功率和安全率（51.9%，44.4%）低于得1.0分的运动员（70%，66.7%）。在得2.5分和2.0分的运动员中，最成功和最安全的百分比值分别为78.6%、78.6%和82.1%、75%。
虽然预计得分高的运动员躯干稳定性会更好，但在我们的研究中，我们在得分与坐姿平衡或躯干稳定性之间遇到了相互矛盾的结果。我们的研究支持文献中建议对功能分级系统进行修改的研究。
