Smith Michael D, Webster Lynn R, Lawler John, Lindhardt Karsten, Dayno Jeffrey M
PRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Egalet Corporation, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pain Med. 2017 May 1;18(5):898-907. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw174.
To compare the relative human abuse potential of intact and manipulated morphine abuse-deterrent, extended-release injection-molded tablets (morphine-ADER-IMT) with that of marketed morphine sulfate ER tablets.
This randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy, active- and placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover, single-center study included adult volunteers who were experienced, nondependent, recreational opioid users. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to placebo, morphine-ADER-IMT (60 mg, intact), morphine-ADER-IMT (60 mg, manipulated), and morphine ER (60 mg, manipulated) and received 1 dose of each oral agent in crossover fashion, separated by ≥5 days. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic endpoints were assessed, including the primary endpoint of peak effect of Drug Liking (E max ) via Drug Liking Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and the secondary endpoints of time to E max (TE max ) and mean abuse quotient (AQ; a pharmacokinetic parameter associated with drug liking).
Thirty-eight participants completed the study. Median Drug Liking VAS E max was significantly lower after treatment with manipulated morphine-ADER-IMT (67) compared with manipulated morphine ER (74; P = 0.007). TE max was significantly shorter after treatment with manipulated morphine ER compared with intact ( P < 0.0001) or manipulated ( P = 0.004) morphine-ADER-IMT. Mean AQ was lower after treatment with intact (5.7) or manipulated (16.4) morphine-ADER-IMT compared with manipulated morphine ER (45.9).
Manipulated morphine-ADER-IMT demonstrated significantly lower Drug Liking E max compared with manipulated morphine ER when administered orally. Morphine-ADER-IMT would be an important new AD, ER morphine product with lower potential for unintentional misuse by chewing or intentional manipulation for oral abuse than currently available non-AD morphine ER products.
比较完整和经处理的吗啡滥用威慑缓释注射成型片(morphine-ADER-IMT)与市售硫酸吗啡缓释片的相对人体滥用潜力。
这项随机、双盲、三模拟、活性药物和安慰剂对照、4交叉、单中心研究纳入了有经验、非依赖性、娱乐性阿片类药物使用者的成年志愿者。参与者按1:1:1:1随机分为安慰剂组、morphine-ADER-IMT(60毫克,完整)组、morphine-ADER-IMT(60毫克,经处理)组和吗啡缓释片(60毫克,经处理)组,并以交叉方式接受每种口服制剂1剂,间隔≥5天。评估药效学和药代动力学终点,包括通过药物喜好视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分得出的药物喜好峰值效应(Emax)这一主要终点,以及达到Emax的时间(TEmax)和平均滥用商数(AQ;与药物喜好相关的药代动力学参数)这些次要终点。
38名参与者完成了研究。与经处理吗啡缓释片(74)相比,经处理的morphine-ADER-IMT治疗后药物喜好VAS Emax中位数显著更低(67;P = 0.007)。与完整(P < 0.0001)或经处理(P = 0.004)的morphine-ADER-IMT相比,经处理吗啡缓释片治疗后的TEmax显著更短。与经处理吗啡缓释片(45.9)相比,完整(5.7)或经处理(16.4)的morphine-ADER-IMT治疗后的平均AQ更低。
口服给药时,经处理的morphine-ADER-IMT与经处理吗啡缓释片相比,其药物喜好Emax显著更低。Morphine-ADER-IMT将是一种重要的新型滥用威慑、缓释吗啡产品,与目前可用的非滥用威慑吗啡缓释产品相比,通过咀嚼无意滥用或故意处理用于口服滥用的可能性更低。