Boels Anne Meike, Hart Huberta E, Rutten Guy E, Vos Rimke C
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Centers, Eerste Oosterparklaan 78, 3544 AK Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Feb;11(1):71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
To compare the proportion of cardiometabolic well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients according to a clearly defined, simple personalised approach, versus the 'one-size-fits-all' approach.
Observational study using routine data of primary care type 2 diabetes patients in the Netherlands. The proportions of patients that reach the targets for HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the two different approaches were compared.
Of the 890 patients (54.7% men, mean age 62.7 years), 31.8% were well-controlled according to the individualised approach and 24.8% according to the 'one-size-fits-all' approach. For specific subgroups personalising the treatment led to a 5.2%, 27.3% and 45.6% increase of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HbA1c and systolic blood pressure goals respectively.
A clearly defined and relatively simple personalised approach leads to a higher proportion of T2DM patients considered as cardiometabolic well-controlled. This approach may especially be beneficial for patients aged ≥70 years on more than metformin monotherapy (HbA1c) and for patients aged ≥80 years (SBP). Precisely these patients are suggested not to benefit from stricter HbA1c or SBP targets, whereas they may experience more adverse effects (e.g. hypoglycaemia, postural hypotension) when a stricter target value is pursued.
比较根据明确界定的简单个性化方法与“一刀切”方法,实现心血管代谢良好控制的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的比例。
使用荷兰基层医疗2型糖尿病患者的常规数据进行观察性研究。比较了两种不同方法中达到糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、收缩压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的患者比例。
在890例患者中(男性占54.7%,平均年龄62.7岁),根据个体化方法,31.8%的患者控制良好;根据“一刀切”方法,这一比例为24.8%。对于特定亚组,个性化治疗分别使达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、HbA1c和收缩压目标的患者比例提高了5.2%、27.3%和45.6%。
明确界定且相对简单的个性化方法可使更多T2DM患者被视为心血管代谢控制良好。这种方法可能对年龄≥70岁且使用不止二甲双胍单药治疗(HbA1c)的患者,以及年龄≥80岁的患者(收缩压)尤其有益。恰恰是这些患者被认为无法从更严格的HbA1c或收缩压目标中获益,而当追求更严格的目标值时,他们可能会经历更多不良反应(如低血糖、体位性低血压)。