Hart Huberta E, Geilen Inge Etm, de Leeuw Elke, Rutten Guy Ehm, Vos Rimke C
University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Centers, Utrecht, Netherlands.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Mar 23;6(3):e47. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6910.
Little attention has been paid to self-management support of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Most studies evaluated the addition of self-management support to regular diabetes care, but self-management as an alternative for part of regular diabetes care has hardly been studied. In this study, we offered patients with well-controlled T2DM the opportunity to perform the 3 quarterly monitoring sessions at home using an Internet-based self-management program, resulting in online personalized advice.
The aim of our study was to assess the reach and feasibility of an Internet-based diabetes self-management support program for patients with well-controlled T2DM, addressing both primary care providers' (PCPs) opinions and patients' willingness to participate in such a support program.
PCPs assessed patients' eligibility for Internet-based self-management, and patients were offered the opportunity to participate. Characteristics of eligible and ineligible patients were compared, as well as those of participants and nonparticipants, also with regard to quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and illness perceptions. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed and odds ratios (ORs) calculated with 95% CIs.
Almost half (128/282, 45.4%) of the patients with well-controlled T2DM were considered ineligible by their PCPs mainly because of cognitive impairment and language barriers (8.2% and 8.9%). Older patients (OR for each year 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09, P<.001), non-Western European patients (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.67-7.92, P=.001), and patients with a longer diabetes duration (OR for each year 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.34, P=.03) were more often regarded as ineligible. Of the 154 patients considered eligible, 57 (37.0%) consented to participate and 30 (10.6%) started the program. Of 57 participants, 45 returned the 3 questionnaires; 21 of 97 nonparticipants returned the questionnaires. Nonparticipants less often thought that their disease would last their entire life (median 8.0 vs 10.0, P=.03) and they were more satisfied with their current treatment than participants (DTSQ total score 44.0 vs 40.0, P=.05). There was no significant difference in quality of life between the 2 groups.
PCPs considered half of their patients with well-controlled T2DM incapable of Internet-based self-management mainly because of cognitive impairment and language barriers; of the selected patients, about 1 out of 3 was willing to participate. Older patients, non-Western European patients, and patients with a higher BMI were less likely to participate. Predominantly, practical issues (such as Internet problems) hindered implementation of the Internet-based self-management program.
对于血糖控制良好的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的自我管理支持关注较少。大多数研究评估了在常规糖尿病护理中增加自我管理支持,但几乎没有研究将自我管理作为部分常规糖尿病护理的替代方案。在本研究中,我们为血糖控制良好的T2DM患者提供了使用基于互联网的自我管理程序在家中进行3次季度监测的机会,并获得在线个性化建议。
我们研究的目的是评估针对血糖控制良好的T2DM患者的基于互联网的糖尿病自我管理支持计划的覆盖范围和可行性,同时考虑初级保健提供者(PCP)的意见以及患者参与此类支持计划的意愿。
PCP评估患者是否适合基于互联网的自我管理,患者有机会参与。比较了符合条件和不符合条件患者的特征,以及参与者和非参与者的特征,还比较了生活质量、治疗满意度和疾病认知方面的情况。进行了多变量逻辑回归模型分析,并计算了优势比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
几乎一半(128/282,45.4%)血糖控制良好的T2DM患者被其PCP认为不符合条件,主要原因是认知障碍和语言障碍(分别为8.2%和8.9%)。老年患者(每年OR为1.06,95%CI为1.03 - 1.09,P <.001)、非西欧患者(OR为3.64,95%CI为1.67 - 7.92,P =.001)以及糖尿病病程较长的患者(每年OR为1.56,95%CI为1.04 - 2.34,P =.03)更常被认为不符合条件。在154名被认为符合条件的患者中,57名(37.0%)同意参与,30名(10.6%)开始了该计划。在57名参与者中,45名返回了3份问卷;97名非参与者中有21名返回了问卷。非参与者较少认为他们的疾病会持续一生(中位数8.0对10.0,P =.03),并且他们对当前治疗比参与者更满意(糖尿病治疗满意度问卷总分44.0对40.0,P =.05)。两组之间的生活质量没有显著差异。
PCP认为一半血糖控制良好的T2DM患者无法进行基于互联网的自我管理,主要原因是认知障碍和语言障碍;在选定的患者中,约三分之一愿意参与。老年患者、非西欧患者和BMI较高的患者参与的可能性较小。主要是实际问题(如互联网问题)阻碍了基于互联网的自我管理计划的实施。