Suppr超能文献

对来自四个取食类群的土壤线虫进行稳定同位素分析(δ(13)C和δ(15)N)。

Stable isotope analysis (δ (13)C and δ (15)N) of soil nematodes from four feeding groups.

作者信息

Melody Carol, Griffiths Bryan, Dyckmans Jens, Schmidt Olaf

机构信息

School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; UCD Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Crop and Soil Systems Research, Scotland's Rural College , Edinburgh , United Kingdom.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2016 Sep 1;4:e2372. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2372. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Soil nematode feeding groups are a long-established trophic categorisation largely based on morphology and are used in ecological indices to monitor and analyse the biological state of soils. Stable isotope ratio analysis ((13)C/(12)C and (15)N/(14)N, expressed as δ (13)C and δ (15)N) has provided verification of, and novel insights into, the feeding ecology of soil animals such as earthworms and mites. However, isotopic studies of soil nematodes have been limited to date as conventional stable isotope ratio analysis needs impractically large numbers of nematodes (up to 1,000) to achieve required minimum sample weights (typically >100 µg C and N). Here, micro-sample near-conventional elemental analysis-isotopic ratio mass spectrometry (μEA-IRMS) of C and N using microgram samples (typically 20 µg dry weight), was employed to compare the trophic position of selected soil nematode taxa from four feeding groups: predators (Anatonchus and Mononchus), bacterial feeders (Plectus and Rhabditis), omnivores (Aporcelaimidae and Qudsianematidae) and plant feeder (Rotylenchus). Free-living nematodes were collected from conventionally and organically managed arable soils. As few as 15 nematodes, for omnivores and predators, were sufficient to reach the 20 µg dry weight target. There was no significant difference in δ (15)N (p = 0.290) or δ (13)C (p = 0.706) between conventional and organic agronomic treatments but, within treatments, there was a significant difference in N and C stable isotope ratios between the plant feeder, Rotylenchus (δ (15)N = 1.08 to 3.22 mUr‰, δ (13)C = -29.58 to -27.87 mUr) and all other groups. There was an average difference of 9.62 mUr in δ (15)N between the plant feeder and the predator group (δ (15)N = 9.89 to 12.79 mUr, δ (13)C = -27.04 to -25.51 mUr). Isotopic niche widths were calculated as Bayesian derived standard ellipse areas and were smallest for the plant feeder (1.37 mUr(2)) and the predators (1.73 mUr(2)), but largest for omnivores (3.83 mUr(2)). These data may reflect more preferential feeding by the plant feeder and predators, as assumed by classical morphology-based feeding groups, and indicate that omnivory may be more widespread across detritivore groups i.e. bacterial feeders (3.81 mUr(2)). Trophic information for soil nematodes derived from stable isotope analysis, scaled as finely as species level in some cases, will complement existing indices for soil biological assessment and monitoring, and can potentially be used to identify new trophic interactions in soils. The isotopic technique used here, to compare nematode feeding group members largely confirm their trophic relations based on morphological studies.

摘要

土壤线虫取食类群是一种长期确立的营养分类,主要基于形态学,用于生态指数中以监测和分析土壤的生物状态。稳定同位素比率分析((13)C/(12)C和(15)N/(14)N,以δ(13)C和δ(15)N表示)已为蚯蚓和螨类等土壤动物的取食生态学提供了验证和新见解。然而,迄今为止,土壤线虫的同位素研究受到限制,因为传统的稳定同位素比率分析需要数量不切实际的大量线虫(多达1000条)才能达到所需的最小样本重量(通常>100μg C和N)。在此,使用微克级样本(通常为20μg干重)对C和N进行微量样本近常规元素分析 - 同位素比率质谱分析(μEA - IRMS),以比较来自四个取食类群的选定土壤线虫类群的营养级:捕食者(Anatonchus和Mononchus)、细菌取食者(Plectus和Rhabditis)、杂食者(Aporcelaimidae和Qudsianematidae)和植物取食者(Rotylenchus)。从传统管理和有机管理的耕地土壤中收集自由生活的线虫。对于杂食者和捕食者,仅15条线虫就足以达到20μg干重目标。传统和有机农艺处理之间的δ(15)N(p = 0.290)或δ(13)C(p = 0.706)没有显著差异,但在处理内,植物取食者Rotylenchus(δ(15)N = 1.08至3.22 mUr‰,δ(13)C = -29.58至-27.87 mUr)与所有其他类群之间的N和C稳定同位素比率存在显著差异。植物取食者与捕食者类群(δ(15)N = 9.89至12.79 mUr,δ(13)C = -27.04至-25.51 mUr)之间的δ(15)N平均差异为9.62 mUr。同位素生态位宽度以贝叶斯推导的标准椭圆面积计算,植物取食者(1.37 mUr²)和捕食者(1.73 mUr²)最小,杂食者最大(3.83 mUr²)。这些数据可能反映了植物取食者和捕食者更具选择性的取食,正如基于经典形态学的取食类群所假设的那样,并表明杂食性可能在碎屑食性类群即细菌取食者(3.81 mUr²)中更为普遍。从稳定同位素分析得出的土壤线虫营养信息,在某些情况下精细到物种水平,将补充现有的土壤生物评估和监测指数,并有可能用于识别土壤中新的营养相互作用。这里使用的同位素技术,用于比较线虫取食类群成员,在很大程度上证实了基于形态学研究的它们的营养关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27be/5012319/e5c96036aef0/peerj-04-2372-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验