Belling D W
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität zu Münster.
Z Gerontol. 1989 May-Jun;22(3):128-37.
A whole range of collective bargaining covenants, staff agreements, and employment contracts stipulate age limits which lead to a termination of employment when the employee reaches a certain age (e.g., 55, 60, or 65). In the Federal Republic of Germany, as opposed to the United States, it tends to be overlooked that this in many cases constitutes a form of "age discrimination", thereby hindering the personal development of the employees affected. The author argues that legal age limits should be evaluated in the light of constitutional standards. He arrives at the conclusion that such age limits frequently do not conform with the guarantees provided by Art. 12 of the Grundgesetz ("Basic Law") of the Federal Republic of Germany. This is particularly true when age limits are implemented as a tool of employment policy. One can but hope that the current line of reasoning of the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Federal Labor Court), which allows a broad application of age limits, will receive an impetus in a new direction. This could come about by a decision of the Full Court of the Bundesarbeitsgericht or by legislative action.
一系列集体谈判契约、员工协议和雇佣合同都规定了年龄限制,一旦员工达到特定年龄(如55岁、60岁或65岁),雇佣关系即告终止。在德意志联邦共和国,与美国不同的是,人们往往忽视了这在许多情况下构成了一种“年龄歧视”形式,从而阻碍了受影响员工的个人发展。作者认为,法定年龄限制应根据宪法标准进行评估。他得出的结论是,此类年龄限制往往不符合德意志联邦共和国《基本法》第12条所提供的保障。当年龄限制被用作就业政策工具时,情况尤其如此。人们只能希望,目前联邦劳动法院允许广泛适用年龄限制的推理思路将朝着新的方向得到推动。这可能通过联邦劳动法院合议庭的裁决或立法行动来实现。