López-Alcón Diego, Marín-Franch Iván, Fernández-Sánchez Vicente, López-Gil Norberto
Ciencias de la Visión research group, Facultad de Óptica y Optometría, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Ciencias de la Visión research group, Facultad de Óptica y Optometría, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain; Departamento de Óptica y Optometría y Ciencias de la Visión, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
The purpose of this work was to find plausible predictors among optical parameters that may explain the inter-individual differences in subjective amplitude of accommodation not explained by age. An exploratory multivariable regression analysis was carried out retrospectively on a dataset with 180 eyes from 97 subjects (ages ranged from 20 to 58years). Subjective amplitudes of accommodation were recorded with the use of a custom-made Badal system. A commercial aberrometer was used to obtain each eye's wavefront during the full range of accommodation. The plausible predictors under study were pupil diameter in the unaccommodated eye, its reduction with accommodation; fourth- and six-order Zernike spherical aberration, their reduction with accommodation, and subjective refraction. At a significance level of 0.05, only fourth- and sixth-order Zernike spherical aberration were found to be predictors of subjective amplitude of accommodation not explained by age, each explaining on their own less than 5% of the variance, and about 9% together. All other optical parameters explained less than 2%. Spherical aberration did not explain the greater variability for younger eyes than for older eyes. The remainder variability in amplitude of accommodation not explained by age or spherical aberration was about ±2.6D for 20year-old subjects, ±1.5D for 40year-old subjects, and about ±0.6D for 55year-old subjects. Optical factors do not seem to account for much of the inter-individual differences in subjective amplitude of accommodation. Most of the variability not explained by age must be due to anatomical differences and physiological, psychological, or other factors.
这项研究的目的是在光学参数中找到可能的预测因素,以解释年龄无法解释的个体间调节主观幅度差异。对来自97名受试者(年龄在20至58岁之间)的180只眼睛的数据集进行了回顾性探索性多变量回归分析。使用定制的巴达尔系统记录调节主观幅度。使用商用像差仪在整个调节范围内获取每只眼睛的波前。所研究的可能预测因素包括未调节眼的瞳孔直径、调节时的瞳孔直径缩小;四阶和六阶泽尼克球差、调节时它们的减小以及主观验光。在显著性水平为0.05时,仅发现四阶和六阶泽尼克球差是年龄无法解释的调节主观幅度的预测因素,各自单独解释的方差不到5%,两者共同解释约9%。所有其他光学参数解释的方差不到2%。球差并未解释年轻眼睛比年长眼睛更大的变异性。年龄或球差无法解释的调节幅度剩余变异性对于20岁受试者约为±2.6D,对于40岁受试者约为±1.5D,对于55岁受试者约为±0.6D。光学因素似乎并不能解释调节主观幅度个体间差异的很大一部分。年龄无法解释的大部分变异性必定归因于解剖学差异以及生理、心理或其他因素。