Valera Luca, Russo María Teresa, Curcio Giuseppe
Faculty of Philosophy y Center of Bioethics. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile,
Faculty of Educational Sciences. Università Roma Tre,
Cuad Bioet. 2016 May-Aug;27(90):163-73.
More and more seems to be necessary to find new ways of communication between medical doctors and bioethicists in order to build a shared vocabulary and to prevent conflicts: many bioethical problems seem to be caused by the lack of dialogue between them, which both seem to speak two different languages. Improving this dialogue means searching new languages and innovative forms of communication: the narration could be a really effective tool to enhance the physicians' and bioethicist's moral conscience, since it facilitates reasoning on someone's particular experience, and, ultimately, on our experience. Starting from the results of a questionnaire administered to a group of students of the Faculty of Medicine and Surgery of the University Campus Bio-Medico we present a theoretical discussion about the need for more dialogue and for a shared vocabulary in medical experiences. In this regard, we suggest as a possible solution to the conflicts among medical doctors and bioethicists, an educational strategy, i.e., humanities courses for medical students, which may help them to deeply describe their practical present (and future) experience.
为了建立共同的词汇并防止冲突，寻找医生与生物伦理学家之间新的沟通方式似乎越来越有必要：许多生物伦理问题似乎是由他们之间缺乏对话导致的，他们似乎说着两种不同的语言。改善这种对话意味着寻找新的语言和创新的沟通形式：叙事可能是增强医生和生物伦理学家道德良知的一种非常有效的工具，因为它有助于对某人的特殊经历进行推理，并最终对我们的经历进行推理。从对罗马生物医学大学校医科与外科专业的一群学生进行问卷调查的结果出发，我们对在医学经验中进行更多对话和拥有共同词汇的必要性进行了理论探讨。在这方面，我们建议作为解决医生与生物伦理学家之间冲突的一种可能方案，即一种教育策略，也就是为医学生开设人文课程，这可能有助于他们深入描述自己当前（以及未来）的实践经验。
