Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, Calif.
Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, Calif.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 May;139(5):1489-1495.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.038. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
EXCELS, a postmarketing observational cohort study, was a commitment to the US Food and Drug Administration to assess the long-term safety of omalizumab in an observational setting, focusing predominantly on malignancies.
The aim of this study was to examine a potential association between omalizumab and cardiovascular (CV)/cerebrovascular (CBV) events in EXCELS.
Patients (≥12 years of age) with moderate to severe allergic asthma and who were being treated with omalizumab (n = 5007) or not (n = 2829) at baseline were followed up for ≤5 years. Analyses included overall CV/CBV events, but focused on the subset of arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs), comprising CV death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and unstable angina. A prespecified analysis of the end point of ATE was conducted to control for available potential confounders. A blinded independent expert panel adjudicated all events.
At baseline, the 2 cohorts had similar demographic characteristics, but severe asthma was more common in the omalizumab versus the non-omalizumab group (50% vs 23%). Omalizumab-treated patients had a higher rate of CV/CBV serious adverse events (13.4 per 1,000 person years [PYs]) than did non-omalizumab-treated patients (8.1 per 1,000 PYs). The ATE rates per 1,000 PYs were 6.66 (101 patients/15,160 PYs) in the omalizumab cohort and 4.64 (46 patients/9,904 PYs) in the non-omalizumab cohort. After control for available confounding factors, the hazard ratio was 1.32 (95% CI, 0.91-1.91).
This observational study demonstrated a higher incidence rate of CV/CBV events in the omalizumab versus the non-omalizumab cohort. Differences in asthma severity between cohorts likely contributed to this imbalance, but some increase in risk cannot be excluded.
EXCELS 是一项上市后观察性队列研究,旨在根据美国食品和药物管理局的要求,在观察环境下评估奥马珠单抗的长期安全性,主要侧重于恶性肿瘤。
本研究旨在检查 EXCELS 中奥马珠单抗与心血管(CV)/脑血管(CBV)事件之间的潜在关联。
纳入基线时有中重度过敏性哮喘且正在接受奥马珠单抗(n=5007)或未接受奥马珠单抗(n=2829)治疗的患者,随访时间最长 5 年。分析包括总体 CV/CBV 事件,但重点关注动脉血栓栓塞事件(ATE)亚组,包括 CV 死亡、心肌梗死、缺血性卒、短暂性脑缺血发作和不稳定型心绞痛。进行了 ATE 终点的预设分析,以控制可用的潜在混杂因素。所有事件均由盲法独立专家小组裁定。
基线时,两组人群的人口统计学特征相似,但奥马珠单抗组严重哮喘的比例(50%)高于未接受奥马珠单抗组(23%)。奥马珠单抗治疗患者的 CV/CBV 严重不良事件发生率(13.4/1000 人年)高于未接受奥马珠单抗组(8.1/1000 人年)。奥马珠单抗组的 ATE 发生率为 6.66/1000 人年(101 例患者/15160 人年),未接受奥马珠单抗组为 4.64/1000 人年(46 例患者/9904 人年)。在控制了可用的混杂因素后,风险比为 1.32(95%CI,0.91-1.91)。
本观察性研究显示,奥马珠单抗组 CV/CBV 事件发生率高于未接受奥马珠单抗组。队列间哮喘严重程度的差异可能导致了这种不平衡,但不能排除风险略有增加的可能性。