• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种不同数字口腔内扫描仪的准确性:正畸托槽和弓丝存在的影响。

Accuracy of four different digital intraoral scanners: effects of the presence of orthodontic brackets and wire.

作者信息

Jung Yoo-Ran, Park Ji-Man, Chun Youn-Sic, Lee Kkot-Nim, Kim Minji

出版信息

Int J Comput Dent. 2016;19(3):203-15.

PMID:27644178
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of four different digital intraoral scanners and the effects of buccal brackets and orthodontic wire.

METHODS

For this study, three sets of models (Control model, BKT model with buccal bracket, and WBKT model with buccal bracket and orthodontic wire) were scanned using four different types of intraoral scanners: E4D dentist, iTero, Trios, and Zfx IntraScan. The mesiodistal width of the teeth, intercanine width, and intermolar width measured by four scanners were compared. Three-dimensional (3D) images of the brackets were taken using the four scanners. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, independent t test, and post-hoc Tukey test at a significance level of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

When comparing the 3D images with manual measurements using a traditional caliper, iTero and Trios showed the highest accuracy in horizontal measurements.iTero had the lowest values in Devmax-min of maxillary intermolar and intercanine widths (0.16 mm and 0.20 mm, respectively), whereas Trios had the lowest values in Devmax-min of mandibular intermolar and intercanine widths (0.36 mm and 0.14 mm, respectively). The horizontal variables were barely affected by the presence of buccal brackets and orthodontic wire. Comparison of 3D bracket images scanned by the four scanners showed differences in image distortion among the scanners. Bracket characteristics did not affect the 3D bracket images.

CONCLUSIONS

The four intraoral scanners used in this study differed in accuracy. However, the results acquired by iTero and Trios were more reliable. Effects of buccal brackets and orthodontic wire on the 3D images taken by intraoral scanners were not clinically significant.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较四种不同数字口内扫描仪的准确性以及颊面托槽和正畸弓丝的影响。

方法

在本研究中,使用四种不同类型的口内扫描仪:E4D牙医扫描仪、iTero扫描仪、Trios扫描仪和Zfx IntraScan扫描仪,对三组模型(对照模型、带颊面托槽的BKT模型和带颊面托槽及正畸弓丝的WBKT模型)进行扫描。比较四种扫描仪测量的牙齿近远中宽度、尖牙间宽度和磨牙间宽度。使用四种扫描仪拍摄托槽的三维(3D)图像。采用单因素方差分析、独立t检验和事后Tukey检验对数据进行分析,显著性水平为P < 0.05。

结果

将3D图像与使用传统卡尺进行的手动测量进行比较时,iTero和Trios在水平测量中显示出最高的准确性。iTero在上颌磨牙间和尖牙间宽度的Devmax-min中值最低(分别为0.16 mm和0.20 mm),而Trios在下颌磨牙间和尖牙间宽度的Devmax-min中值最低(分别为0.36 mm和0.14 mm)。水平变量几乎不受颊面托槽和正畸弓丝的影响。对四种扫描仪扫描的3D托槽图像进行比较,结果显示扫描仪之间存在图像失真差异。托槽特征不影响3D托槽图像。

结论

本研究中使用的四种口内扫描仪在准确性上存在差异。然而,iTero和Trios获得的结果更可靠。颊面托槽和正畸弓丝对口内扫描仪拍摄的3D图像的影响在临床上并不显著。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of four different digital intraoral scanners: effects of the presence of orthodontic brackets and wire.四种不同数字口腔内扫描仪的准确性:正畸托槽和弓丝存在的影响。
Int J Comput Dent. 2016;19(3):203-15.
2
Impact of Orthodontic Brackets on the Intraoral Scan Data Accuracy.正畸托槽对口腔内扫描数据准确性的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5075182. doi: 10.1155/2016/5075182. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
Reliability and validity of intraoral and extraoral scanners.口内和口外扫描仪的可靠性与有效性。
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:38. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0108-7. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
4
Effect of the presence of orthodontic brackets on intraoral scans.正畸托槽对口腔内扫描的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):98-104. doi: 10.2319/040420-254.1.
5
Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine.临床托槽点配准与三维激光扫描仪和坐标测量机的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):59-65. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.059-065.oar.
6
Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.锥形束计算机断层扫描牙科测量的可靠性和准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016.
7
Accuracy on Scanned Images of Full Arch Models with Orthodontic Brackets by Various Intraoral Scanners in the Presence of Artificial Saliva.在人工唾液存在的情况下,各种口内扫描仪对带正畸托槽的全弓模型扫描图像的准确性。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 27;2020:2920804. doi: 10.1155/2020/2920804. eCollection 2020.
8
Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.自锁托槽系统与传统托槽系统对牙槽骨下颌的影响:一项CBCT和牙模研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):50-7. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.050-057.oar.
9
Evaluation of scanning accuracy for two commercially available intraoral scanners in reproducing orthodontic bracket dimensions.评价两种商业化口内扫描仪复制正畸托槽尺寸的扫描精度。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Sep;27(17):7898-7906. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33548.
10
Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.使用自锁托槽和传统托槽治疗牙列拥挤时下颌牙弓的变化。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):248-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp123. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
What to Prefer in Patients with Multibracket Appliances? Digital vs. Conventional Full-Arch Impressions-A Reference Aid-Based In Vivo Study.多托槽矫治器患者应选择什么?数字化与传统全牙弓印模——一项基于参考辅助的体内研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 23;12(9):3071. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093071.
2
The transfer accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions influenced by fixed orthodontic appliances: a reference aid-based in vitro study.固定正畸矫治器对数字化和传统全口印模转移精度的影响:基于参考辅助的体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jan;27(1):273-283. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04721-5. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Accuracy of a Method to Monitor Root Position Using a 3D Digital Crown/Root Model during Orthodontic Treatments.
正畸治疗期间使用三维数字冠/根模型监测牙根位置方法的准确性
Tomography. 2022 Feb 23;8(2):550-559. doi: 10.3390/tomography8020045.
4
Intraoral Scanners in Orthodontics: A Critical Review.口腔内扫描仪在正畸学中的应用:一项批判性评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031407.
5
The Effects of Orthodontic Brackets on the Time and Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking.正畸托槽对数字化印模采集时间和准确性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 16;18(10):5282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105282.
6
Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.四种口腔内扫描仪对不同托槽材料的托槽特征和槽沟底角的扫描准确性:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 13;14(2):365. doi: 10.3390/ma14020365.
7
Effect of the presence of orthodontic brackets on intraoral scans.正畸托槽对口腔内扫描的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):98-104. doi: 10.2319/040420-254.1.
8
Accuracy on Scanned Images of Full Arch Models with Orthodontic Brackets by Various Intraoral Scanners in the Presence of Artificial Saliva.在人工唾液存在的情况下,各种口内扫描仪对带正畸托槽的全弓模型扫描图像的准确性。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 27;2020:2920804. doi: 10.1155/2020/2920804. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparison of the occlusal contact area of virtual models and actual models: a comparative in vitro study on Class I and Class II malocclusion models.虚拟模型与实际模型咬合接触面积的比较:关于安氏Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类错颌模型的体外对比研究
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0566-7.