Suppr超能文献

直接面向消费者的基因检测公司提供的全基因组测序知情同意书的内容分析

Content Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing Offered by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.

作者信息

Niemiec Emilia, Borry Pascal, Pinxten Wim, Howard Heidi Carmen

机构信息

Erasmus Plus Doctoral Programme in Law, Science and Technology, CIRSFID, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Law, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 2016 Dec;37(12):1248-1256. doi: 10.1002/humu.23122. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have become increasingly available in the research and clinical settings and are now also being offered by direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing (GT) companies. This offer can be perceived as amplifying the already identified concerns regarding adequacy of informed consent (IC) for both WES/WGS and the DTC GT context. We performed a qualitative content analysis of Websites of four companies offering WES/WGS DTC regarding the following elements of IC: pre-test counseling, benefits and risks, and incidental findings (IFs). The analysis revealed concerns, including the potential lack of pre-test counseling in three of the companies studied, missing relevant information in the risks and benefits sections, and potentially misleading information for consumers. Regarding IFs, only one company, which provides opportunistic screening, provides basic information about their management. In conclusion, some of the information (and related practices) present on the companies' Web pages salient to the consent process are not adequate in reference to recommendations for IC for WGS or WES in the clinical context. Requisite resources should be allocated to ensure that commercial companies are offering high-throughput sequencing under responsible conditions, including an adequate consent process.

摘要

全外显子组测序(WES)和全基因组测序(WGS)在研究和临床环境中越来越普及,现在一些直接面向消费者(DTC)的基因检测(GT)公司也提供此类服务。这种情况可能会加剧人们已经发现的对WES/WGS以及DTC GT环境下知情同意(IC)充分性的担忧。我们对四家提供WES/WGS DTC服务的公司网站进行了定性内容分析,涉及IC的以下几个方面:检测前咨询、益处和风险以及偶发发现(IFs)。分析发现了一些问题,包括在所研究的四家公司中有三家可能缺乏检测前咨询,风险和益处部分缺少相关信息,以及可能对消费者产生误导的信息。关于IFs,只有一家提供机会性筛查的公司提供了有关其管理的基本信息。总之,就临床背景下WGS或WES的IC建议而言,公司网页上与同意过程相关的一些信息(及相关做法)并不充分。应分配必要资源,以确保商业公司在负责任的条件下提供高通量测序服务,包括适当的同意程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验