Niazi Saleem Asif, Hassan Zaheer Ul, Atif Khaula, Ullah Saeed
Dr. Saleem Asif Niazi, MBBS, MCPS, FCPS Department of ENT, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Dr. Zaheer Ul Hassan, MBBS, FCPS Department of ENT, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):927-30. doi: 10.12669/pjms.324.9497.
To compare the results of permeatal approach without raising the tympano-meatal flap to end-aural or post-aural approach in myringoplasty.
This Quasi-experimental study was carried out in CMH (Combined Military Hospital) Peshawar, from August 2006 to July 2013. Three hundred fifty patients of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) with dry central; small, medium and large perforations were selected. They were divided into two groups depending upon the type of approach. In Group-A (n-200); permeatal approach without raising tympano-meatal flap was used; while in Group-B (n-150) end-aural or post-aural approach was used. Subjects were followed up for two years; graft take was checked regularly by examinations of ear under microscope. Data was collected on structured Performa and analysed by SPSS-17.
Male and female were 74% and 26% respectively; Age ranged from 15 to 46 Years. There was no significant difference in the graft success at the end of two years in Group-A(80%) and Group-B(85%) (p-0.261). Type of approach had a significant impact on duration of surgery(p<0.001) and post-operative recovery time(p<0.001).
The permeatal approach and end-aural/post-aural approach had almost equal graft success rates, but former is more useful as it causes lesser morbidity, decreased post-operative hospital stay and reduced operative time. It is under-utilized and should be employed more frequently.
比较在鼓膜成形术中不掀起鼓室-耳道皮瓣的经耳道入路与耳内或耳后入路的效果。
这项准实验研究于2006年8月至2013年7月在白沙瓦联合军事医院进行。选取350例慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)干性中央型、小、中、大穿孔患者。根据入路类型将他们分为两组。A组(n = 200)采用不掀起鼓室-耳道皮瓣的经耳道入路;而B组(n = 150)采用耳内或耳后入路。对受试者进行了两年的随访;定期通过显微镜下耳部检查来检查移植物的存活情况。数据收集在结构化表格上,并使用SPSS - 17进行分析。
男性和女性分别占74%和26%;年龄范围为15至46岁。A组(80%)和B组(85%)在两年结束时移植物成功率无显著差异(p = 0.261)。入路类型对手术持续时间(p < 0.001)和术后恢复时间(p < 0.001)有显著影响。
经耳道入路与耳内/耳后入路的移植物成功率几乎相等,但前者更有用,因为它导致的发病率较低、术后住院时间缩短且手术时间减少。它未得到充分利用,应更频繁地使用。