Mohan Narasimhamurthy, Black Jennifer O, Schwartz Mary R, Zhai Qihui Jim
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana Botswana.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado, USA.
Am J Transl Res. 2016 Aug 15;8(8):3337-41. eCollection 2016.
Although the microscopic features of invasion are usually readily recognized, occasionally invasive ductal carcinoma may mimic the pattern of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by forming large cellular nests with circumscribed borders, but lacking a definitive myoepithelial cell layer. In these cases, the histologic pattern may appear deceptively noninvasive and the absence of a myoepithelial layer can be easily overlooked. We prospectively examined 10 cases of high grade DCIS. P63, smooth muscle actin, muscle specific actin and calponin immunohistochemical stains were used to identify the presence of myoepithelial cells. In our study, 20% of apparent high grade DCIS cases did not exhibit a myoepithelial layer surrounding large, solid nests with comedo necrosis. Since invasion is defined by the absence of a myoepithelial layer, these results suggest that a DCIS-like pattern may actually represent invasive disease in some cases. Immunohistochemical studies may be essential in making this distinction and in avoiding the potential diagnostic pitfall.
尽管浸润的微观特征通常很容易识别,但偶尔浸润性导管癌可能会通过形成边界清晰的大细胞巢来模仿粉刺型导管原位癌(DCIS)的模式,但缺乏明确的肌上皮细胞层。在这些病例中,组织学模式可能看似没有浸润,肌上皮层的缺失很容易被忽视。我们前瞻性地检查了10例高级别DCIS。使用P63、平滑肌肌动蛋白、肌肉特异性肌动蛋白和钙调蛋白免疫组化染色来识别肌上皮细胞的存在。在我们的研究中,20%明显的高级别DCIS病例在伴有粉刺样坏死的大实性巢周围未显示肌上皮层。由于浸润是由肌上皮层的缺失来定义的,这些结果表明在某些情况下,DCIS样模式实际上可能代表浸润性疾病。免疫组化研究对于做出这种区分和避免潜在的诊断陷阱可能至关重要。