Pelusi Serena, Petta Salvatore, Rosso Chiara, Borroni Vittorio, Fracanzani Anna Ludovica, Dongiovanni Paola, Craxi Antonio, Bugianesi Elisabetta, Fargion Silvia, Valenti Luca
Internal Medicine and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Gastroenterology, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 20;11(9):e0163069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163069. eCollection 2016.
The clinical determinants of fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are still under definition.
To assess the clinical determinants of fibrosis progression rate (FPR) in NAFLD patients with baseline and follow-up histological evaluation, with a special focus on the impact of pharmacological therapy.
In an observational cohort of 118 Italian patients from tertiary referral centers, liver histology was evaluated according to Kleiner. Independent predictors of FPR were selected by a stepwise regression approach.
Median follow-up was 36 months (IQR 24-77). Twenty-five patients (18%) showed some amelioration, 63 (53%) had stability, 30 (25%) had progression of fibrosis. Patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) had similar demographic and anthropometric features, but a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D; p = 0.010), and use of renin-angiotensin axis system (RAS) inhibitors (p = 0.005). Fibrosis progression was dependent of the length of follow-up, and was associated with, but did not require, the presence of NASH (p<0.05). Both fibrosis progression and faster FPR were independently associated with higher APRI score at follow-up, absence of treatment with RAS inhibitors, and T2D diagnosis at baseline (p<0.05). There was a significant interaction between use of RAS inhibitors and T2D on FPR (p = 0.002). RAS inhibitors were associated with slower FPR in patients with (p = 0.011), but not in those without (p = NS) T2D.
NASH is not required for fibrosis progression in NAFLD, whereas T2D seems to drive fibrogenesis independently of hepatic inflammation. Use of RAS inhibitors may contrast fibrosis progression especially in high-risk patients affected by T2D.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)中纤维化进展的临床决定因素仍未明确。
通过对NAFLD患者进行基线和随访组织学评估,评估纤维化进展率(FPR)的临床决定因素,特别关注药物治疗的影响。
在一个来自三级转诊中心的118例意大利患者的观察队列中,根据克莱纳标准评估肝脏组织学。通过逐步回归方法选择FPR的独立预测因素。
中位随访时间为36个月(四分位间距24 - 77个月)。25例患者(18%)病情有所改善,63例(53%)病情稳定,30例(25%)纤维化进展。非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)患者具有相似的人口统计学和人体测量学特征,但2型糖尿病(T2D)患病率更高(p = 0.010),且使用肾素 - 血管紧张素轴系统(RAS)抑制剂的比例更高(p = 0.005)。纤维化进展取决于随访时间长度,与NASH的存在相关,但并非必需(p<0.05)。纤维化进展和更快的FPR均与随访时更高的APRI评分、未使用RAS抑制剂治疗以及基线时T2D诊断独立相关(p<0.05)。RAS抑制剂的使用与T2D对FPR存在显著交互作用(p = 0.002)。RAS抑制剂与T2D患者(p = 0.011)FPR较慢相关,但与无T2D患者(p =无显著性差异)无关。
NAFLD中纤维化进展并非需要NASH,而T2D似乎独立于肝脏炎症驱动纤维化形成。使用RAS抑制剂可能对抗纤维化进展,尤其是在受T2D影响的高危患者中。