Ghoochani Khorasani Ahmad, Shadnia Shahin, Mashayekhian Mohammad, Rahimi Mitra, Aghabiklooei Abbas
Department of Clinical Toxicology, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Medical Sciences, Amin Police University, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Clinical Toxicology, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:4901026. doi: 10.1155/2016/4901026. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
Background. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common health care-associated infection. To prevent this complication, aspiration of subglottic secretions using Hi-Lo Evac endotracheal tube (Evac ETT) is a recommended intervention. However, there are some reports on Evac ETT dysfunction. We aimed to compare the incidence of VAP (per ventilated patients) in severely ill poisoned patients who were intubated using Evac ETT versus conventional endotracheal tubes (C-ETT) in our toxicology ICU. Materials and Methods. In this clinical randomized trial, 91 eligible patients with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation of more than 48 hours were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups: (1) subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) group who were intubated by Evac ETT (n = 43) and (2) control group who were intubated by C-ETT (n = 48). Results. Of the 91 eligible patients, 56 (61.5%) were male. VAP was detected in 24 of 43 (55.8%) patients in the case group and 23 of 48 (47.9%) patients in the control group (P = 0.45). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were S. aureus (54.10%) and Acinetobacter spp. (19.68%). The incidence of VAP and ICU length of stay were not significantly different between the two groups, but duration of intubation was statistically different and was longer in the SSD group. Mortality rate was less in SSD group but without a significant difference (P = 0.68). Conclusion. The SSD procedure was performed intermittently with one-hour intervals using 10 mL syringe. Subglottic secretion drainage does not significantly reduce the incidence of VAP in patients receiving MV. This strategy appears to be ineffective in preventing VAP among ICU patients.
背景。呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是最常见的医疗保健相关感染。为预防这一并发症,使用高低压可撤离气管内导管(Evac ETT)抽吸声门下分泌物是一项推荐的干预措施。然而,有一些关于Evac ETT功能障碍的报道。我们旨在比较在我们的毒理学重症监护病房中,使用Evac ETT与传统气管内导管(C-ETT)进行气管插管的重症中毒患者中VAP的发生率(每例机械通气患者)。材料与方法。在这项临床随机试验中,招募了91例预期机械通气时间超过48小时的符合条件的患者,并将其随机分为两组:(1)声门下分泌物引流(SSD)组,通过Evac ETT进行气管插管(n = 43);(2)对照组,通过C-ETT进行气管插管(n = 48)。结果。在91例符合条件的患者中,56例(61.5%)为男性。病例组43例患者中有24例(55.8%)检测到VAP,对照组48例患者中有23例(47.9%)检测到VAP(P = 0.45)。最常分离出的微生物是金黄色葡萄球菌(54.10%)和不动杆菌属(19.68%)。两组之间VAP的发生率和重症监护病房住院时间无显著差异,但插管时间在统计学上有差异,SSD组更长。SSD组的死亡率较低,但无显著差异(P = 0.68)。结论。使用10 mL注射器以1小时间隔间歇性地进行SSD操作。声门下分泌物引流并不能显著降低接受机械通气患者的VAP发生率。该策略在预防重症监护病房患者的VAP方面似乎无效。