Valencia Mauricio, Ferrer Miquel, Farre Ramon, Navajas Daniel, Badia Joan Ramon, Nicolas Josep Maria, Torres Antoni
Unitat de Cures Intensives I Intermèdies, Servei de Pneumologia, Institut Clinic del Torax, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1543-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266686.95843.7D.
The aspiration of subglottic secretions colonized by bacteria pooled around the tracheal tube cuff due to inadvertent deflation (<20 cm H2O) of the cuff plays a relevant role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We assessed the efficacy of an automatic, validated device for the continuous regulation of tracheal tube cuff pressure in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Respiratory intensive care unit and general medical intensive care unit.
One hundred and forty-two mechanically ventilated patients (age, 64 +/- 17 yrs; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 18 +/- 6) without pneumonia or aspiration at admission.
Within 24 hrs of intubation, patients were randomly allocated to undergo continuous regulation of the cuff pressure with the automatic device (n = 73) or routine care of the cuff pressure (control group, n = 69). Patients remained in a semirecumbent position in bed.
The primary end point variable was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Main causes for intubation were decreased consciousness (43, 30%) and exacerbation of chronic respiratory diseases (38, 27%). Cuff pressure <20 cm H2O was more frequently observed in the control than the automatic group (45.3 vs. 0.7% determinations, p < .001). However, the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia with clinical criteria (16, 22% vs. 20, 29%) and microbiological confirmation (11, 15% vs. 10, 15%), the distribution of early and late onset, the causative microorganisms, and intensive care unit (20, 27% vs. 16, 23%) and hospital mortality (30, 41% vs. 23, 33%) were similar for the automatic and control groups, respectively.
Cuff pressure is better controlled with the automatic device. However, it did not result in additional benefits to the semirecumbent position in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.
气管插管套囊因意外放气(<20 cm H₂O)导致细菌在套囊周围积聚,声门下分泌物的抽吸在呼吸机相关性肺炎的发病机制中起重要作用。我们评估了一种经过验证的自动装置持续调节气管插管套囊压力对预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的效果。
前瞻性随机对照试验。
呼吸重症监护病房和普通内科重症监护病房。
142例机械通气患者(年龄64±17岁;急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II,18±6),入院时无肺炎或误吸。
插管后24小时内,患者被随机分配接受自动装置持续调节套囊压力(n = 73)或套囊压力常规护理(对照组,n = 69)。患者保持半卧位卧床。
主要终点变量为呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。插管的主要原因是意识下降(43例,30%)和慢性呼吸道疾病加重(38例,27%)。对照组比自动装置组更频繁地观察到套囊压力<20 cm H₂O(测定值分别为45.3%和0.7%,p < 0.001)。然而,符合临床标准的呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率(分别为16例,22%对20例,29%)和微生物学确诊率(分别为11例,15%对10例,15%)、早发和晚发的分布、致病微生物,以及重症监护病房死亡率(分别为20例,27%对16例,23%)和医院死亡率(分别为30例,41%对23例,33%)在自动装置组和对照组中相似。
自动装置能更好地控制套囊压力。然而,在预防呼吸机相关性肺炎方面,它并未给半卧位带来额外益处。