Roth Gael S, Bichard Philippe, Fior-Gozlan Michele, Roth Hubert, Auroux Jean, Risse Olivier, Letoublon Christian, Laverrière Marie Hélène, Bricault Ivan, Leroy Vincent, Decaens Thomas
Clinique Universitaire d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Pôle Digidune, CHU Grenoble, Alpes; INSERM U1209, Grenoble, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Clinique Universitaire d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Pôle Digidune, CHU Grenoble, Alpes.
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Sep;4(9):E997-E1003. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108854. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
Endobiliary brushing during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the main technique used to diagnose a malignant stricture, but has a poor sensitivity. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing during ERCP to diagnose a malignant stricture, compared to brushing alone.
Between January 2007 and December 2012, all consecutive patients undergoing ERCP to treat a biliary stricture were included. After a biliary sphincterotomy, 3 mL to 10 mL of bile was aspirated into the brush catheter and collected in a dry sterile tube before and after brushing (to yield three samples). Brushing was performed as commonly recommended.
One hundred eleven patients (68 males, 43 females) were included; mean age 67 ± 15.4 years. A final diagnosis of malignant stricture was established in 51 patients, including 43 cholangiocarcinomas; 60 patients had benign strictures. Specificity (Sp) and positive predictive values were 100% for all samples. The diagnostic performance of the three-sample combination of bile aspiration + brushing + bile aspiration was significantly greater than brushing alone (P = 0.004): sensitivity (Se) = 84.3 % vs. Se = 66.7 %. The three-sample combination gave a negative predictive value of 88.2 %, and a diagnostic accuracy of 92.8 %. When suspicious results were added to malignant results as positive results, the three-sample combination gave Sp = 91.7 % and Se = 94.1 %.
In cases of biliary stricture, conducting bile aspiration before and after brushing significantly increased the ability to diagnose a malignant stricture with a sensitivity of 84.3 % (P = 0.004).
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)期间进行胆管刷检是诊断恶性狭窄的主要技术,但敏感性较差。本研究评估了ERCP期间胆管刷检联合胆汁抽吸诊断恶性狭窄的诊断性能,并与单纯刷检进行比较。
纳入2007年1月至2012年12月期间所有接受ERCP治疗胆管狭窄的连续患者。在进行胆管括约肌切开术后,在刷检前后将3毫升至10毫升胆汁吸入刷检导管,并收集在干燥无菌试管中(以获得三个样本)。按照通常建议进行刷检。
纳入111例患者(男性68例,女性43例);平均年龄67±15.4岁。最终诊断为恶性狭窄的患者有51例,其中包括43例胆管癌;60例患者为良性狭窄。所有样本的特异性(Sp)和阳性预测值均为100%。胆汁抽吸+刷检+胆汁抽吸的三联样本诊断性能显著高于单纯刷检(P = 0.004):敏感性(Se)= 84.3% 对比 Se = 66.7%。三联样本的阴性预测值为88.2%,诊断准确率为92.8%。当将可疑结果与恶性结果作为阳性结果相加时,三联样本的Sp = 91.7%,Se = 94.1%。
在胆管狭窄病例中,刷检前后进行胆汁抽吸显著提高了诊断恶性狭窄的能力,敏感性为84.3%(P = 0.004)。