Suppr超能文献

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中胆汁抽吸联合刷检诊断恶性胆管狭窄的效能

Performance of bile aspiration plus brushing to diagnose malignant biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

作者信息

Roth Gael S, Bichard Philippe, Fior-Gozlan Michele, Roth Hubert, Auroux Jean, Risse Olivier, Letoublon Christian, Laverrière Marie Hélène, Bricault Ivan, Leroy Vincent, Decaens Thomas

机构信息

Clinique Universitaire d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Pôle Digidune, CHU Grenoble, Alpes; INSERM U1209, Grenoble, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Clinique Universitaire d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Pôle Digidune, CHU Grenoble, Alpes.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2016 Sep;4(9):E997-E1003. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108854. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endobiliary brushing during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the main technique used to diagnose a malignant stricture, but has a poor sensitivity. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing during ERCP to diagnose a malignant stricture, compared to brushing alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2012, all consecutive patients undergoing ERCP to treat a biliary stricture were included. After a biliary sphincterotomy, 3 mL to 10 mL of bile was aspirated into the brush catheter and collected in a dry sterile tube before and after brushing (to yield three samples). Brushing was performed as commonly recommended.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven patients (68 males, 43 females) were included; mean age 67 ± 15.4 years. A final diagnosis of malignant stricture was established in 51 patients, including 43 cholangiocarcinomas; 60 patients had benign strictures. Specificity (Sp) and positive predictive values were 100% for all samples. The diagnostic performance of the three-sample combination of bile aspiration + brushing + bile aspiration was significantly greater than brushing alone (P = 0.004): sensitivity (Se) = 84.3 % vs. Se = 66.7 %. The three-sample combination gave a negative predictive value of 88.2 %, and a diagnostic accuracy of 92.8 %. When suspicious results were added to malignant results as positive results, the three-sample combination gave Sp = 91.7 % and Se = 94.1 %.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of biliary stricture, conducting bile aspiration before and after brushing significantly increased the ability to diagnose a malignant stricture with a sensitivity of 84.3 % (P = 0.004).

摘要

背景与研究目的

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)期间进行胆管刷检是诊断恶性狭窄的主要技术,但敏感性较差。本研究评估了ERCP期间胆管刷检联合胆汁抽吸诊断恶性狭窄的诊断性能,并与单纯刷检进行比较。

患者与方法

纳入2007年1月至2012年12月期间所有接受ERCP治疗胆管狭窄的连续患者。在进行胆管括约肌切开术后,在刷检前后将3毫升至10毫升胆汁吸入刷检导管,并收集在干燥无菌试管中(以获得三个样本)。按照通常建议进行刷检。

结果

纳入111例患者(男性68例,女性43例);平均年龄67±15.4岁。最终诊断为恶性狭窄的患者有51例,其中包括43例胆管癌;60例患者为良性狭窄。所有样本的特异性(Sp)和阳性预测值均为100%。胆汁抽吸+刷检+胆汁抽吸的三联样本诊断性能显著高于单纯刷检(P = 0.004):敏感性(Se)= 84.3% 对比 Se = 66.7%。三联样本的阴性预测值为88.2%,诊断准确率为92.8%。当将可疑结果与恶性结果作为阳性结果相加时,三联样本的Sp = 91.7%,Se = 94.1%。

结论

在胆管狭窄病例中,刷检前后进行胆汁抽吸显著提高了诊断恶性狭窄的能力,敏感性为84.3%(P = 0.004)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6da3/5025307/f3325464ca15/10-1055-s-0042-108854-i470ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验