II Medical Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):961-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
Because of the low sensitivity of current ERCP-guided tissue sampling methods, management of patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures is a challenge. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables real-time microscopic visualization of strictures during an ongoing ERCP.
To document the utility, performance, and accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis compared with histopathology.
Prospective observational study within the framework of a multicenter registry.
Five academic centers.
This study involved 102 patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Clinical information, ERCP findings, tissue sampling results, and pCLE videos were collected prospectively. Investigators were asked to provide a presumptive diagnosis based on pCLE during the procedure before pathology results were available. All patients received at least 30 days of follow-up until definitive diagnosis of malignancy was established or 1-year follow-up if index tissue sampling was benign.
Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of ERCP-guided pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition.
There were no pCLE-related adverse events in the study. We were able to evaluate 89 patients, of whom 40 were proven to have cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of pCLE for detecting cancerous strictures were 98%, 67%, 71%, and 97%, respectively, compared with 45%, 100%, 100%, and 69% for index pathology. This resulted in an overall accuracy of 81% for pCLE compared with 75% for index pathology. Accuracy for combination of ERCP and pCLE was significantly higher compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition (90% vs 73%; P = .001).
Investigators had access to all relevant clinical information, which may have biased the predictive characteristics of pCLE.
Probe-based CLE provides reliable microscopic examination and has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value. The significantly higher accuracy of ERCP and pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition may support supplementing ERCP with pCLE.
由于当前 ERCP 引导下组织采样方法的敏感性较低,因此对不确定的胰胆管狭窄患者的处理是一个挑战。基于探头的共聚焦激光内窥镜检查(pCLE)可在进行中的 ERCP 期间实时微观可视化狭窄。
记录实时 pCLE 诊断与组织病理学相比的实用性、性能和准确性。
多中心注册框架内的前瞻性观察性研究。
五个学术中心。
这项研究涉及 102 例不确定的胰胆管狭窄患者。
前瞻性收集临床信息、ERCP 结果、组织采样结果和 pCLE 视频。在获得病理结果之前,研究者被要求根据 pCLE 在手术过程中提供假定诊断。所有患者均接受至少 30 天的随访,直到确定恶性肿瘤的明确诊断,或如果索引组织采样为良性则进行 1 年随访。
与 ERCP 引导下的组织采集相比,ERCP 引导下 pCLE 的诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性。
本研究中无与 pCLE 相关的不良事件。我们能够评估 89 例患者,其中 40 例被证实患有癌症。与索引病理学相比,pCLE 检测癌性狭窄的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 98%、67%、71%和 97%,而指数病理学分别为 45%、100%、100%和 69%。这导致 pCLE 的总体准确性为 81%,而索引病理学为 75%。与 ERCP 联合组织采集相比,ERCP 联合 pCLE 的准确性显著更高(90%比 73%;P =.001)。
研究者可以获得所有相关的临床信息,这可能会影响 pCLE 的预测特征。
基于探头的 CLE 可提供可靠的微观检查,具有出色的敏感性和阴性预测值。与 ERCP 联合组织采集相比,ERCP 联合 pCLE 的准确性显著更高,这可能支持 ERCP 联合 pCLE 检查。