• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理资源分配的伦理问题。

Ethics of rationing of nursing care.

机构信息

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2018 Aug;25(5):591-600. doi: 10.1177/0969733016664973. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1177/0969733016664973
PMID:27653513
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rationing of various needed services, for example, nursing care, is inevitable due to unlimited needs and limited resources. Rationing of nursing care is considered an ethical issue since it requires judgment about potential conflicts between personal and professional values.

OBJECTIVES

The present research sought to explore aspects of rationing nursing care in Iran.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study applied qualitative content analysis, a method to explore people's perceptions of everyday life phenomena and interpret the subjective content of text data. Data collection was performed through in-depth, unstructured, face-to-face interviews with open-ended questions. Participants and research context: The study population included Iranian nurses of all nursing positions, from clinical nurses to nurse managers. Purposive sampling was employed to select 15 female and 3 male nurses (11 clinical nurses, 3 supervisors, 1 matron, 1 nurse, and 2 members of the Nursing Council) working in hospitals of three cities in Iran. Ethical considerations: The study protocol was approved by Tehran University of Medical Sciences (91D1302870). Written informed consent was also obtained from all participants.

FINDINGS

According to the participants, rationing of nursing care consisted of two categories, that is, causes of rationing and consequences of rationing. The first category comprised three subcategories, namely, patient needs and demands, routinism, and VIP patients. The three subcategories forming the second category were missed nursing care, patient dissatisfaction, and nurses' feeling of guilt.

CONCLUSION

Levels at which healthcare practices are rationed and clarity of the rationing are important structural considerations in the development of an equal, appropriate, and ethical healthcare system. Moreover, the procedure of rationing is critical as it not only influences people's lives but also reflects the values that dominate in the society. Therefore, in order to minimize the negative consequences of rationing of nursing care, further studies on the ethical dimensions of this phenomenon are warranted.

摘要

背景

由于无限的需求和有限的资源,各种必要服务(例如护理)的配给是不可避免的。护理配给被认为是一个伦理问题,因为它需要对个人和专业价值观之间潜在的冲突进行判断。

目的

本研究旨在探讨伊朗护理配给的各个方面。

研究设计

本研究采用定性内容分析法,这是一种探索人们对日常生活现象的看法并解释文本数据主观内容的方法。通过深入、非结构化、面对面的访谈,采用开放式问题收集数据。

参与者和研究背景

研究人群包括所有护理岗位的伊朗护士,从临床护士到护士长。采用目的抽样法选择了 15 名女性和 3 名男性护士(11 名临床护士、3 名主管、1 名护士长、1 名护士和 2 名护理委员会成员),他们在伊朗三个城市的医院工作。

伦理考虑

该研究方案得到了德黑兰医科大学(91D1302870)的批准。所有参与者均获得书面知情同意。

结果

根据参与者的说法,护理配给包括两个类别,即配给的原因和配给的后果。第一类包括三个亚类,即患者需求和要求、例行公事和 VIP 患者。第二类包括三个亚类,即护理缺失、患者不满和护士的内疚感。

结论

医疗实践配给的水平和配给的明确性是建立公平、适当和符合伦理的医疗保健系统的重要结构考虑因素。此外,配给程序至关重要,因为它不仅影响人们的生活,而且反映了主导社会的价值观。因此,为了最大限度地减少护理配给的负面影响,有必要进一步研究这一现象的伦理维度。

相似文献

1
Ethics of rationing of nursing care.护理资源分配的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Aug;25(5):591-600. doi: 10.1177/0969733016664973. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
2
The ethical dimension of nursing care rationing: A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.护理资源分配的伦理维度:定性研究的主题综合
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Dec;22(8):881-900. doi: 10.1177/0969733014551377. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
3
Equity in nursing care: A grounded theory study.护理中的公平性:扎根理论研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Mar;26(2):598-610. doi: 10.1177/0969733017712079. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
4
The hidden ethical element of nursing care rationing.护理资源分配中隐藏的伦理因素。
Nurs Ethics. 2014 Aug;21(5):583-93. doi: 10.1177/0969733013513210. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
5
From painful busyness to emotional immunization: Nurses' experiences of ethical challenges.从痛苦的忙碌到情感免疫:护士面临伦理挑战的经历
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Aug;24(5):556-568. doi: 10.1177/0969733015620938. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
6
Unmet Needs for Clinical Ethics Support Services in Nurse: Based on focus group interviews.护士临床伦理支持服务的未满足需求:基于焦点小组访谈。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Jun;25(4):505-519. doi: 10.1177/0969733016654312. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
7
Rationing home-based nursing care: professional ethical implications.家庭护理配给:专业伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 May;18(3):386-96. doi: 10.1177/0969733011398099.
8
Ethical leadership outcomes in nursing: A qualitative study.护理中的伦理领导力结果:一项定性研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Dec;25(8):1051-1063. doi: 10.1177/0969733016687157. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
9
Nurses, the Oppressed Oppressors: A Qualitative Study.护士,受压迫者的压迫者:一项定性研究。
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Mar 18;7(5):239-45. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p239.
10
Factors affecting nursing error communication in intensive care units: A qualitative study.影响重症监护病房护理差错沟通的因素:一项定性研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Feb;28(1):131-144. doi: 10.1177/0969733020952100. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Missed Nursing Care in Danish Hospitals: A National Survey.丹麦医院中被忽视的护理服务:一项全国性调查。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Jun;39(2):e70027. doi: 10.1111/scs.70027.
2
The dual protective role of accountability: Mitigating missed nursing care and nurse moral distress in a nested diary study design.问责制的双重保护作用:在嵌套日记研究设计中减轻护理缺失和护士道德困扰
J Clin Nurs. 2025 May;34(5):1741-1752. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17322. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Outcomes of professional misconduct by nurses: a qualitative study.护士职业行为不当的后果:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 25;23(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01859-3.
4
The relationship between the ethical attitudes and holistic competence levels of intensive care nurses: A cross-sectional study.重症监护护士伦理态度与整体能力水平的关系:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0287648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287648. eCollection 2023.
5
Rationing of Nursing Care on Example of Selected Health Care Facility.护理资源分配:以某医疗保健机构为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 5;18(23):12824. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312824.
6
Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-ethical or unethical?儿科重症监护病房的资源分配——合乎伦理还是不合乎伦理?
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2836-2844. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-334.
7
Anticipated nursing care: findings from a qualitative study.预期护理:一项定性研究的结果
BMC Nurs. 2020 Oct 6;19:93. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00486-y. eCollection 2020.
8
Safe and competent nursing care: An argument for a minimum standard?安全且胜任的护理服务:是否需要一个最低标准?
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Sep;27(6):1396-1407. doi: 10.1177/0969733020919137. Epub 2020 May 18.
9
Healthcare professionals' ethical competence: A scoping review.医疗保健专业人员的道德能力:一项范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2018 Jul 16;6(1):5-17. doi: 10.1002/nop2.173. eCollection 2019 Jan.