Carney Nancy, Totten Annette M, O'Reilly Cindy, Ullman Jamie S, Hawryluk Gregory W J, Bell Michael J, Bratton Susan L, Chesnut Randall, Harris Odette A, Kissoon Niranjan, Rubiano Andres M, Shutter Lori, Tasker Robert C, Vavilala Monica S, Wilberger Jack, Wright David W, Ghajar Jamshid
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York.
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.
The scope and purpose of this work is 2-fold: to synthesize the available evidence and to translate it into recommendations. This document provides recommendations only when there is evidence to support them. As such, they do not constitute a complete protocol for clinical use. Our intention is that these recommendations be used by others to develop treatment protocols, which necessarily need to incorporate consensus and clinical judgment in areas where current evidence is lacking or insufficient. We think it is important to have evidence-based recommendations to clarify what aspects of practice currently can and cannot be supported by evidence, to encourage use of evidence-based treatments that exist, and to encourage creativity in treatment and research in areas where evidence does not exist. The communities of neurosurgery and neuro-intensive care have been early pioneers and supporters of evidence-based medicine and plan to continue in this endeavor. The complete guideline document, which summarizes and evaluates the literature for each topic, and supplemental appendices (A-I) are available online at https://www.braintrauma.org/coma/guidelines.
综合现有证据并将其转化为建议。本文件仅在有证据支持时才提供建议。因此,它们并不构成完整的临床使用方案。我们的意图是让其他人利用这些建议来制定治疗方案,在当前证据不足或缺乏的领域,这些方案必然需要纳入共识和临床判断。我们认为,基于证据的建议很重要,它可以阐明目前实践中哪些方面能够得到证据支持,哪些不能,鼓励使用现有的基于证据的治疗方法,并鼓励在缺乏证据的领域进行治疗和研究创新。神经外科和神经重症监护领域一直是循证医学的早期先驱和支持者,并计划继续致力于此。完整的指南文件总结并评估了每个主题的文献,补充附录(A - I)可在https://www.braintrauma.org/coma/guidelines在线获取。