Suppr超能文献

影响颈椎融合术后长期翻修率的人口统计学、临床及手术因素

Demographic, Clinical, and Operative Factors Affecting Long-Term Revision Rates After Cervical Spine Arthrodesis.

作者信息

Derman Peter B, Lampe Lukas P, Hughes Alexander P, Pan Ting Jung, Kueper Janina, Girardi Federico P, Albert Todd J, Lyman Stephen

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 21;98(18):1533-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00938.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on long-term revision rates following cervical spine arthrodeses. The purposes of this study were to define reoperation rates after primary cervical arthrodeses and to identify risk factors for revisions.

METHODS

New York State's all-payer health-care database was queried to identify all primary subaxial cervical arthrodeses occurring in the 16 years from 1997 through 2012. A total of 87,042 patients were included in the study cohort. Demographic information was extracted. Patients' preoperative medical comorbidities, surgical indications, and operative approaches were assembled using codes from the ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification). The cohort was followed to revision surgical procedures, death, or the end of the study period. All subsequent contiguous spinal arthrodeses, including in the subaxial cervical spine, were considered revisions. The overall revision risk and the risk associated with various preoperative characteristics, surgical indications, and operative approaches were assessed using a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

During the study period, 6,721 patients (7.7%) underwent revision. The median time to revision was 24.5 months. The probability of undergoing at least one revision by 192 months was 12.6%. Arthrodeses performed via anterior-only approaches had a significantly higher probability of revision (p < 0.001) at 13.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 12.9% to 13.9%) than those performed via posterior approaches at 7.4% (95% CI, 6.6% to 8.4%) or circumferential (anterior and posterior) approaches at 5.2% (95% CI, 4.0% to 6.8%). This relationship persisted in multivariate analysis; compared with anterior surgical procedures, there was a significantly lower risk of revision (p < 0.001) for posterior surgical approaches at a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.84) and circumferential approaches at a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.66). Patient age of 18 to 34 years, white race, insurance status of Workers' Compensation or Medicare, and surgical procedures for spinal stenosis, spondylosis, deformity, and neoplasm were associated with elevated revision risk. Arthrodeses spanning few levels and those performed for fractures had a lower revision risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary subaxial cervical spine arthrodeses had a probability of revision approaching 13% over a 16-year period, with elevated reoperation rates in patients undergoing anterior-only surgical procedures. Age, race, insurance status, surgical indication, and number of spinal levels included in the arthrodesis were also associated with reoperation risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

关于颈椎融合术后长期翻修率的数据有限。本研究的目的是确定初次颈椎融合术后的再次手术率,并识别翻修的危险因素。

方法

查询纽约州的全支付方医疗保健数据库,以识别1997年至2012年这16年间所有初次下颈椎融合术。共有87042例患者纳入研究队列。提取人口统计学信息。使用ICD-9-CM(国际疾病分类,第九版,临床修订本)编码收集患者术前的内科合并症、手术指征和手术入路。对该队列进行随访,直至翻修手术、死亡或研究期结束。所有后续连续的脊柱融合术,包括下颈椎的融合术,均视为翻修。使用Cox比例风险模型评估总体翻修风险以及与各种术前特征、手术指征和手术入路相关的风险。

结果

在研究期间,6721例患者(7.7%)接受了翻修手术。翻修的中位时间为24.5个月。到192个月时至少进行一次翻修的概率为12.6%。仅通过前路入路进行的融合术翻修概率显著更高(p<0.001),为13.4%(95%置信区间[95%CI],12.9%至13.9%),而通过后路入路进行的为7.4%(95%CI,6.6%至8.4%),通过前后联合(环形)入路进行的为5.2%(95%CI,4.0%至6.8%)。这种关系在多变量分析中持续存在;与前路手术相比,后路手术的翻修风险显著更低(p<0.001),风险比为0.76(95%CI,0.69至0.84),环形入路的风险比为0.53(95%CI,0.42至0.66)。年龄在18至34岁的患者、白人种族、工伤赔偿或医疗保险的保险状态以及针对椎管狭窄、脊柱退变、畸形和肿瘤的手术与翻修风险升高相关。融合节段少的融合术以及因骨折进行的融合术翻修风险较低。

结论

初次下颈椎融合术在16年期间的翻修概率接近13%,仅接受前路手术的患者再次手术率升高。年龄、种族、保险状态、手术指征以及融合术中包括的脊柱节段数也与再次手术风险相关。

证据水平

治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验