Sigirci Ozge, Rockmore Marc, Wansink Brian
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kıklareli University, Istanbul Turkey.
Department of Economics, Clark University, Worcester, MA USA.
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 6;7:1298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01298. eCollection 2016.
Traumatic experiences - such as combat, living in a conflict country or war-torn nation, or experiencing a violent crime or natural disaster - change social relationships and may also influence a life-time of consumer relationships with brands and shopping. Our focus on this previously overlooked area is centered on an analysis of the long-term shopping habits of 355 combat veterans. We show that those who experienced heavy trauma (e.g., heavy combat) exhibited similar disconnection from brands as others have experienced in social relationships. They became more transactional in that they were more open to switching brands, to trying new products, and buying the least expensive alternative (p < 0.01). In contrast, those who had experienced a light trauma were more influenced by ads and more open to buying brands even when they cost more (p < 0.00). Trauma, such as combat, may change one's decision horizon. Functionality and price become more important, which is consistent with the idea that they are more focused on the present moment than on building on the past or saving for the future.
创伤性经历——如战斗、生活在冲突国家或饱受战争蹂躏的国家,或经历暴力犯罪或自然灾害——会改变社会关系,也可能影响一生与品牌和购物的消费关系。我们对这一此前被忽视领域的关注集中在对355名退伍军人长期购物习惯的分析上。我们发现,那些经历过严重创伤(如激烈战斗)的人与其他人在社会关系中经历的情况类似,表现出与品牌的脱节。他们变得更注重交易,更愿意更换品牌、尝试新产品并购买最便宜的替代品(p < 0.01)。相比之下,那些经历过轻度创伤的人更容易受到广告影响,即使价格更高也更愿意购买品牌产品(p < 0.00)。战斗等创伤可能会改变一个人的决策视野。功能性和价格变得更加重要,这与他们更关注当下而非基于过去或为未来储蓄的观点一致。