• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋部骨折诉讼:对国民保健服务诉讼管理局数据的十年回顾及国家指南的影响

Hip fracture litigation: A 10-year review of NHS Litigation Authority data and the effect of national guidelines.

作者信息

Fanous R, Sabharwal S, Altaie A, Gupte C M, Reilly P

机构信息

Department of Trauma Orthopaedics, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London, W2 1NY , UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Jan;99(1):17-21. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0277. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2016.0277
PMID:27659364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5392801/
Abstract

We present a review evaluating all litigation claims relating to hip fractures made in a 10-year period between 2005 and 2015. Data was obtained from the NHS Litigation Authority through a freedom of information request. All claims relating to hip fractures were reviewed. During the period analysed, 216 claims were made, of which 148 were successful (69%). The total cost of settling these claims was in excess of £5 million. The introduction of a best-practice tariff by the Department of Health in 2010 was designed to improve the quality of care for hip fracture patients. This was followed by guidance from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in 2011 and the British Orthopaedic Association in 2012. We analysed claims submitted before and after these guidelines were introduced and no significant difference in the number of claims was noted. The most common cause for litigation was a delay in diagnosis, which accounted for 86 claims in total (40%). Despite the presence of these guidelines and targets, there has not been a significant reduction in the number of claims or an improvement in diagnostic accuracy. This may be due to an increasing level of litigation in the UK but we must also question whether we are indeed providing best-practice care to our hip fracture patients and whether these guidelines need further review.

摘要

我们发表了一篇综述,评估了2005年至2015年这10年间与髋部骨折相关的所有诉讼索赔。数据是通过信息自由请求从英国国家医疗服务诉讼局获取的。对所有与髋部骨折相关的索赔进行了审查。在分析的时间段内,共提出了216项索赔,其中148项成功(69%)。解决这些索赔的总成本超过500万英镑。2010年卫生部引入了最佳实践收费标准,旨在提高髋部骨折患者的护理质量。随后,2011年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所和2012年英国骨科协会发布了相关指南。我们分析了这些指南发布前后提交的索赔,发现索赔数量没有显著差异。诉讼的最常见原因是诊断延误,总共占86项索赔(40%)。尽管有这些指南和目标,但索赔数量并未显著减少,诊断准确性也没有提高。这可能是由于英国诉讼水平的提高,但我们也必须质疑我们是否真的为髋部骨折患者提供了最佳实践护理,以及这些指南是否需要进一步审查。

相似文献

1
Hip fracture litigation: A 10-year review of NHS Litigation Authority data and the effect of national guidelines.髋部骨折诉讼:对国民保健服务诉讼管理局数据的十年回顾及国家指南的影响
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Jan;99(1):17-21. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0277. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
2
NHSLA litigation in hip fractures: Lessons learnt from NHSLA data.英国国家医疗服务诉讼局(NHSLA)关于髋部骨折的诉讼:从NHSLA数据中吸取的教训
Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1853-1857. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Medical malpractice claims in relation to colorectal malignancy in the national health service.国家医疗服务体系中与结直肠恶性肿瘤相关的医疗事故索赔。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jan;16(1):48-56. doi: 10.1111/codi.12408.
4
Clinical negligence in foot and ankle surgery: A 17-year review of claims to the NHS Litigation Authority.足踝外科的医疗过失:对向国民保健服务诉讼管理局提出索赔的17年回顾。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11):1510-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.33963.
5
NHS litigation in bariatric surgery over a ten year period.在过去十年中,NHS 在减肥手术方面的诉讼。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:14-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
6
Extent of medicolegal burden in neurosurgery - An analysis of the National Health Service Litigation Authority Database.神经外科医疗法律负担的程度——对国民保健服务诉讼管理局数据库的分析
Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(5):622-9. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1054362. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
7
Wrist and scaphoid fractures: a 17-year review of NHSLA litigation data.腕部及舟骨骨折:对国民保健服务诉讼局(NHSLA)诉讼数据的17年回顾。
Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):682-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
8
Litigation in National Health Service oral and maxillofacial surgery: review of the last 15 years.国民医疗服务体系口腔颌面外科的诉讼:过去15年回顾
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;50(5):385-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
9
An analysis of successful litigation claims in children in England.英格兰儿童成功诉讼案例分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Sep;96(9):838-40. doi: 10.1136/adc.2011.212555. Epub 2011 Jun 18.
10
Delayed diagnosis in primary care-The main cause of sarcoma litigation in the United Kingdom.基层医疗中的延迟诊断——英国肉瘤诉讼的主要原因。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(4):361-3. doi: 10.1002/jso.24149. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Why do orthopaedic surgeons get sued? An analysis of £2.2 billion in claims against NHS England: trends in litigation and strategies to enhance care.骨科医生为何会被起诉?对英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)英格兰地区22亿英镑索赔案的分析:诉讼趋势及改善医疗的策略
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jun 21;145(1):351. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05957-y.
2
A mixed-methods survey to explore issues with virtual consultations for musculoskeletal care during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项混合方法调查,旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间肌肉骨骼护理虚拟咨询中存在的问题。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 5;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04113-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The determinants of mortality and morbidity during the year following fracture of the hip: a prospective study.髋部骨折后一年内死亡率和发病率的决定因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Mar;97-B(3):383-90. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.34504.
2
Wrist and scaphoid fractures: a 17-year review of NHSLA litigation data.腕部及舟骨骨折:对国民保健服务诉讼局(NHSLA)诉讼数据的17年回顾。
Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):682-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
3
Clinical negligence in foot and ankle surgery: A 17-year review of claims to the NHS Litigation Authority.足踝外科的医疗过失:对向国民保健服务诉讼管理局提出索赔的17年回顾。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11):1510-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.33963.
4
Essential care after an inpatient fall: National Patient Safety Agency advice.住院患者跌倒后的基本护理:国家患者安全机构的建议。
Br J Nurs. 2011;20(7):424-5. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2011.20.7.424.